If that is not a threat, I do not know what is??? But you are right no one can read your mind. After trying to follow your posts I have concluded it is a jumbled mess of conflicting reasoning and attitudes. More than a few negative stereotypes come to mind
Probably the biggest flaw in your reasoning is that you refuse to acknowledge that there was a social stigma in the 50s, and in the 70s, that caused rape victims not to want to come forward. I had a fiancé who was raped in the 80s who refused to come forward. Even now most studies conclude that a third or less of rapes are reported. As I read through your posts it is pretty easy to understand why no woman has ever confided in you that she was raped.
Here we have an example of you threatening to expose my wife, her dad and me about domestic violence that she experienced growing up. There is less of a stigma against victims of domestic violence than there is against victims of rape, yet you felt that threatening us with exposure would cause me to shut up. I am not sure that you are even consciously aware of how your actions and words can and will be interpreted and would result in people and especially women not confiding in you.
As far as you being a New Yorker... from your writing style I doubt that would be any big surprise to anyone reading your posts. But no matter where you have resided, your mannerisms and thought process has most likely prevented many people both women and men from confiding in you. I know that I have shared way too much. Unfortunately, that has resulted in you leading a very sheltered life regardless of where you have worked. It is very obvious from your posts.
RE: If that is not a threat, I do not know what is???
It is NOT A THREAT YOU FOOL, IT IS A PROCESS THAT CAN DETERMINE WHO A PERP IS *ASSUMING* A CREDIBLE ACCUSATION IS MADE.
You can’t even differentiate between a theoretical concept and a real threat. And here you are trying to psychologize me.
I have NOTHING PERSONAL against you, I even sympathize with your story so CUT IT OUT.
RE: Probably the biggest flaw in your reasoning is that you refuse to acknowledge that there was a social stigma in the 50s, and in the 70s, that caused rape victims not to want to come forward
Listen, I can only be a product of my upbringing and the places I have lived and my experiences. Just because you experienced something does not mean that this experience is replicated everywhere in this big country.
RE: As far as you being a New Yorker... from your writing style I doubt that would be any big surprise to anyone reading your posts. But no matter where you have resided, your mannerisms and thought process has most likely prevented many people both women and men from confiding in you.
All I can say is this — you presume to know me when all you can surmise is from what you’ve read so far. Also, you have DONE NOTHING to change my mind ( and I BADLY want to ). All I can say is this -— YOU ARE WRONG IN YOUR PRESUMPTIONS ABOUT ME.
BTW, let me repeat this — I don’t want to talk about your wife because doing so only bring’s out the personal accusatory imp in you.
Let’s stick to the issue at hand -— THE EVIDENCE. Where is it? And I’d like you to refute all the articles that I just presented above. They seem to tell a different story about young, traumatized Natalie Wood, and Powerful, Hollywood mogul Kirk Douglas ( NOT ).