Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: yarddog
600 BC is pretty far back. They thought they were descendants of Trojans who escaped the destruction of Troy.

That was the invention of Virgil to tie Rome to the great epics of Homer and give it a national legend all its own. And to curry favor with Julius Caesar and/or Augustus by renaming Aeneas son Julius, implying the family Julii were the founders of Rome.

As I understand it, and I'm just an armchair reader of history so take that caveat to heart, Romans of the time more generally believed that Romulus founded Rome and it fell under Etruscan rule in the mystic past until there was an uprising that freed the city from Etruscan rule led by one Brutus, and this played into the pressure put on Brutus' descendant centuries later to help kill his own mentor Julius Caesar. The symbolism of a Brutus once again liberating Rome from the grip of a tyrant made for good optics.

24 posted on 02/18/2020 12:39:50 PM PST by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: pepsi_junkie
Vergil did not start the tradition that Aeneas was the ancestor of Romulus...that had been around for a long time. Julius Caesar minted coins with Aeneas carrying his father Anchises on his back...the Julii claimed to be descended from Iulus, a son of Aeneas.

A number of vases with Aeneas on them were found at the Etruscan city of Vulci, as if there was a strong interest in him there. Maybe the Romans picked it up from the Etruscans.

38 posted on 02/18/2020 1:52:11 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson