Woah... not so fast, there is soooo much "research" yet to be done on this subject.
How do you know she's not a scientist? 7
1) Fauci's models
2) The CA Doc's projections/extrapolations
3) Global Warming models (ALL)
4) My "Models" that I am currently posting every night.
There IS something called a "Model" in science, but it is really a theory, and CANNOT BE VIOLATED.
EXAMPLE: The "Standard Model of Particle Physics" will be thrown out, trashed, if there is ever a single exception to it discovered experimentally.
Just because a person has a PhD, and calls him/herself a scientist, DOES NOT MAKE SOMETHING SCIENCE.
I would maybe consider them Projections based on past observation and assumptions. Of course, the assumptions are the hard part because they can be used to try to be accurate, or to try to project whatever the "expert" is trying to project.
With global warming "models", it's essentially whatever the entity paying the grant wants the projection to be.
I like that explanation, thanks.
Woah... not so fast, there is soooo much "research" yet to be done on this subject.
How do you know she's not a scientist? 7
If there was a LIKE button on FR, you just got a bunch of 'em from me.
Won't bother with any "I did this" or "I am that" sh**.
I just spent enough time in the business that I approach being physically ill when those media/political [BLEEPS] call stuff they push on us "science".
It's obscene.