Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nonsporting

I agree with you regarding Craig. He might be seen to be the “blunt instrument” Fleming writes about in the books, but he has very little of the sophistication and snobbery of Bond in the books.

Can’t imagine Craig fitting into Ian Fleming’s clubbable world. He might be the bouncer on the door, but not the man drinking cocktails and playing baccarat. Strangely - and for all the campiness of his films - Moore would seem to be the most comfortable fit for that environment.

Plus, Moore films are fun, which is more than I can say for the last Daniel Craig outing. Enough with the angst and navel gazing, Bond, just do your job for once!


40 posted on 07/03/2020 8:26:26 AM PDT by Savrola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Savrola

Plus, Moore films are fun, which is more than I can say for the last Daniel Craig outing. Enough with the angst and navel gazing, Bond, just do your job for once!

_______________________________________________

Don’t forget MOONRAKER...It had some good parts...There was US Space Force in that movie...

Even A VIEW TO A KILL was interesting at times...Like the hot tub scene with Bond and the KGB agent in San Francisco...


84 posted on 07/03/2020 11:39:56 PM PDT by L.A.Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson