Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/20/2020 9:34:44 AM PDT by rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: rey

The USSC decides legal issues.

They do not ‘pick’ the president.


2 posted on 09/20/2020 9:37:28 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey

I thought a SC tie means the lower court ruling stands.


3 posted on 09/20/2020 9:38:07 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey

The House would select POTUS


4 posted on 09/20/2020 9:38:23 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Vote Giant Meteor in 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey

There no doubt will be legal issues that will have to be settled. 4-4 is just a recipe for disaster.


5 posted on 09/20/2020 9:39:34 AM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey
It shouldn't happen.

Contested elections are at the state level. If a state lets it drag on for too long, there are one of two possibilities:

  1. The state legislatures step in and asserts its Article II Section 1 power and selects the Electors directly.
  2. The states fail to appoint Electors and they don't participate in the Electoral College. The 12th amendment says that a majority of "appointed" electors is needed to win the Presidency. Pennsylvania's 20 Electors and Michigan's 16 Electors will be un-appointed, lowering the majority to win from 270 to 252.

There is nothing for a court to do. The Electors will either be there or not; the Electoral College will Constitutionally function with or without them.

In Florida in 2000, the election hadn't progressed to the contested part because the results weren't certified when SCOTUS stepped in to stop the unconstitutional partial recount. The Florida legislature was ready to intervene with option #1 above when the court stopped the recount.

-PJ

6 posted on 09/20/2020 9:39:35 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey

In general when the Supreme Court cannot come to a decision, the lower court’s ruling stands..


8 posted on 09/20/2020 9:41:22 AM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey
This article tries to address that issue but ultimately fails...

Here's How The Supreme Court Will Function With Eight Justices Leading Up To The Election, by Zoe Tillman, BuzzFeed News, September 18, 2020.

In summary, it says the court will try hard to avoid a tie, that there are five conservative justices and three liberal justices, but Roberts isn't always a reliable conservative vote. In ordinary cases, they can postpone a decision until the ninth justice is seated. But it dodges the central question.

One particular item of note: "...there are more than 300 election-related cases pending in state and federal courts."

9 posted on 09/20/2020 9:43:41 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom ("And oft conducted by historic truth, We tread the long extent of backward time.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey

I wouldn’t assume that whoever Trump appoints, if someone ends up getting appointed, will automatically rule in favor of Trump including in election matters. We have seen cases where Trump judges go out of their way to show how “unbiased” they are. That could well be the case with the newest justice too, especially if she goes through an acrimonious process.


11 posted on 09/20/2020 9:47:02 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey

One thing is sure - one sees almost no talk of a “Trump landslide” any more. It seems this board in 2020 is more sober-minded and realistic of Trump’s chances than it was in 2008 of McCain’s chances.


12 posted on 09/20/2020 9:52:10 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey

Oh, this won’t happen! After all, the GOP has made the majority of the appointments of the sitting justices - starting with that stalwart of conservative readings of our Constitution, Chief Justice Roberts.


16 posted on 09/20/2020 10:06:58 AM PDT by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey

At this early point, It looks like The President will nominate someone who can get appointed quickly, someone who has recently been appointed to a federal position by this same senate, for instance, and any republican senator who will not vote the same way will be in fact trying to throw this nation-saving election to the despotic Harris and company. That would be a spot too tough to get out of for the perpetual Trump-underestimating Romney

Another obvious point to consider is Trump is not a wimpy republican. He will not in any way attempt to appease the left. He will nominate someone this week.


17 posted on 09/20/2020 10:07:36 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey

If it’s 4-4, then Al Gore becomes acting president.


19 posted on 09/20/2020 10:12:33 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (Committee to Re-Elect the President ( CREEP ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey

President Trump is still the President until the next President is installed.


28 posted on 09/20/2020 10:27:29 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey

Neither.

Grassley, Pres Pro Tiem.


30 posted on 09/20/2020 10:28:47 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey

If the situation gets that messed up we handle it with mud wrestling.


38 posted on 09/20/2020 10:34:11 AM PDT by discostu (Like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey
"...there is another contested election and the court splits evenly on who should be president..."


40 posted on 09/20/2020 10:37:08 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey

If Supreme Court does not have 9 Judges, then it goes to the House of Representatives.

In other words Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats will give it to Biden.

This is why it is so paramount to get a new Supreme Court Justice.

The Democrats know this.


43 posted on 09/20/2020 10:48:57 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey

That’s why we must fill the seat before the election.


45 posted on 09/20/2020 10:54:52 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rey

It goes to the House for final decision if neither candidate gets 270.


52 posted on 09/20/2020 11:48:20 AM PDT by DownInFlames (Gals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Jeez...can we stop with the drama queen vanities?

“We” are not going to do anything. Pelosi not going to be President.

I know there is not much going on in people’s lives, but for goodness sake, we should spend more time thinking about actually doing some research and reading before posting shit like this.


68 posted on 09/20/2020 1:12:36 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson