Replies

Read it... I am and have been in SELF DEFENSE MODE the whole time. In fact I was attacked first and my only “sin” was DEFENDING MYSELF.

Do I have a right to defend myself from attack on my faith and ideology???

If not... Which faith and sect is the only acceptable faith sect and free from attack?

Hence my question... Whole lot of folks willing to break the rules and ATTACK OTHERS, But even when they try to defend themselves they are still stoned for trying to do that.

Damned if you do, and damned if you don’t. Because of the screwed up mentality of those who judge there is no way to believe what you yourself might like to believe...

Really??? Self defense is “Combative??? This is the exact hypocritical lying ass crap I exposed here. It is the 180 degree spin of irrational radical extremist self righteous nuts...

No... I did not throw the first blow. I have only been defending myself from aggressive “combativeness” since the whole ignorant stupid thing started.

Your weird screed started with:

“I would like some clarification as to the truth of the rules and situation here on the FR. Several times over the last few years it has been mandated by certain users that a prerequisite for participating here, conversing here, or donating here is mandated that you must first be a White Puritan Christian. No exceptions or you are considered a Troll. You must believe what they believe exactly or you should hit the highway.”

Then, you ended with

“If only White Puritan Christians are allowed here then it needs to shared what sect exactly of hundreds???”

I think most all FReepers here “see you”, preacher.

Read it... I am and have been in SELF DEFENSE MODE the whole time.
***Baloney. You jumped on a freeper over historicity and I started riding your heretical butt ever since.

In fact I was attacked first and my only “sin” was DEFENDING MYSELF.
***You aint doin’ a very good job of it. You use all kinds of logical fallacies, you push heretical line of reasoning, you posted an offensive opus.

Do I have a right to defend myself from attack on my faith and ideology???
***Yes. And we have the right to correct heretics.

If not... Which faith and sect is the only acceptable faith sect and free from attack?
***There you go again with that sect stuff, and the bullshiite of acting like one is acceptable which it says NOWHERE. But JimRob reserves the right to hound heretical evangelicals and I + other FReepers have the right to point out your fallacies and heresies.

Hence my question... Whole lot of folks willing to break the rules and ATTACK OTHERS,
***Attack? Pointing out logical fallacies is an attack? What sort of 2nd grade midrasa do you come from? Also, where is it in the rules? It aint. You post heresies then we are free to highlight and correct them.

But even when they try to defend themselves they are still stoned for trying to do that.
***Once again you scurry on over to the evocative hyperbolic religious language to vilify your opponent in a straw argument. You have not been stoned, you have been corrected — which is what the bible tells us to do with false teachers.

Damned if you do, and damned if you don’t.
***Uhh, no. If you had simply kept your mouth shut and not open this offensive thread, our interaction would have drifted into obscurity. But instead you’re trying to defend a very poorly written, very halfbaked opus. This is on YOU.

Because of the screwed up mentality of those who judge
***People who correct false teachers have a screwed up mentality? They are obeying what Christ said to do and He even modeled the behavior. Or do you accuse Christ of being unChristlike when He was confronting the false teachers of His day?

there is no way to believe what you yourself might like to believe...
***Of COURSE there is. You believe in a heresy. So keep it to yourself. And when you issue a throwdown on -historicity, be prepared to defend it — which you weren’t.

Really??? Self defense is “Combative???
***Being combative is combative. Not answering questions is combative. Using logical fallacies is combative. Posting heretical, useless vanities is combative.

This is the exact hypocritical lying ass crap I exposed here.
***You didn’t expose anything. I exposed you as heretic and will continue to do so.

It is the 180 degree spin of irrational radical extremist self righteous nuts...
***You are the one who is irrational, radical, extremist, self-righteous, fallacious, and on top of it, heretical.

No... I did not throw the first blow.
***Yes you did. I posted it upthread.

I have only been defending myself from aggressive “combativeness” since the whole ignorant stupid thing started.
***I have been holding your feet to the hermeneutical fire all along, in the manner the Lord used to do, and I have managed to highlight that you are simply a heretic.