CDC Admits Post-Vaccine Myocarditis Concerns That Were Labeled Covid Misinformation Are Legit

The Federalist ^ | SEPTEMBER 09, 2022 | Sophia Corso

[george76]

In context, the CDC’s latest numbers about post-vax myocarditis represent a significant departure from last year’s narrative pushed by health bureaucrats and the media.

When reports first surfaced in 2021 that some cases of myocarditis — the inflammation of the heart muscle, potentially leading to blood clots and heart attack or stroke — were potentially associated with the Covid-19 vaccine, the corporate media and its fact-checkers were quick to label them as misinformation, saying the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh its small risks.

A year later, though, the media can no longer deny that what they called misinformation actually has data to back it up. As Matt Shapiro detailed in his Substack post on the matter, “Last year’s misinformation on vaccine-associated myocarditis in young men is this year’s well-established fact.”

According to Vaccine Safety Datalink surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) conducted in 2022, within a week of receiving the “Dose 2 Primary Series” of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, there were 14 verified cases of myocarditis or pericarditis among the 102,091 males aged 16-17 who got the shot. Among the nearly 206,000 12-15-year-old males who received the same series, 31 cases were confirmed within a week.

...

These numbers might seem small or meaningless, but in context, they represent a significant departure from last year’s conventional wisdom pushed by health bureaucrats and parroted by the media: In 2021, the CDC’s reported rates of myocarditis during the 0-7 day “risk period” following vaccination were significantly lower compared to recent numbers.

For instance, in August last year, the CDC reported 42.6 per million cases and 71.5 per million cases for 12-15 and 16-17-year-old males, respectively, but now the health agency admits those incidence rates are actually 150.5 per million for the younger group and 137.1 per million for the older. Among 16- and 17-year-old males, the incidence rate jumps to a whopping 188 per million following the first booster, with 9 of the 47,874 developing heart inflammation in the week after that shot.

...

While rates from the latest CDC study are “3-5 times higher for young men than what the CDC was reporting this time last year,” other health experts, whom the media discredited, were ahead of the curve. Data from a study conducted by Tracy Hoeg, MD, Ph.D., and others in 2021 aligns with the latest CDC numbers from 2022.

...

The doctors reported a rate of 94 cases of “cardiac adverse events” per million for 16-17-year-old males and 162 per million for 12-15-year-old males. While this is compatible with the latest CDC study, the corporate media and its fact-checkers labeled it misinformation when it was published last year.

Following the Hoeg study’s publication, the British Medical Journal claimed critics called the study “deeply flawed” and said it delivered “an antivaccine message.” PolitiFact reported that posts about myocarditis risk on Facebook “were flagged as part” of the platform’s “efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed.” Big Tech used these so-called fact-checks to censor good-faith Americans, dissenting medical experts, and even lawmakers who questioned the CDC’s vaccinations-for-all narrative.

For example, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., was labeled “fundamentally dangerous” in his efforts to let Americans discuss adverse reactions they experienced after receiving Covid shots. The Wisconsin senator’s YouTube channel was also temporarily suspended in November 2021 — for the fifth time — after posting “a video of a panel on vaccine-related injuries” that was deemed “Covid misinformation.” Yet adverse effects do occur, as even the CDC has acknowledged, including the aforementioned vaccine-associated myocarditis.

Efforts to quash alternative research prevented members of the public from considering this information, which would have allowed them to make better-informed decisions about the Covid jab for themselves and their children. As Hoeg wrote on Twitter, “If we hadn’t been vilified [sic] as ‘anti-vaxxers’ spreading ‘mis’ & ‘disinformation’, how would the conversation around minimizing the chance of this adverse event have changed & how many cases of myo/pericarditis in young males would have been prevented over the last year?”

Concern about myocarditis was not the only Covid-related content to be decried as “misinformation” and nuked from the public square though. The corporate media, health bureaucrats, and even President Biden repeated the narrative that Covid vaccines prevent the transmission of the virus. In November 2021, USA Today ran an article stating, “vaccines work against contracting, spreading Covid-19,” fact-checking social media posts that raised concern about “whether the shots work[ed].” The vaccine-hesitant and those who resisted sweeping mandates were smeared as “anti-vaxxers.”

But as The Federalist reported, the ruling regime was the real purveyor of misinformation. In January 2022, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky finally admitted on CNN that the vaccines can’t “prevent transmission.”

Many pandemic concerns that were once labeled misinformation have since proved to be true, such as learning loss due to school closures, the effectiveness of natural immunity, the ineffectiveness of cloth face coverings, and the social and economic harms of mass lockdowns, just to name a few. The ruling class being wrong about myocarditis risk is just the latest in its long list of misinforming the public about what’s misinformation — to the detriment of free speech, institutional trust, and public health.

[bagster]

Do you ever feel like it’s time to raise your head out of the sand and recognize just how ridiculous your vaccine conspiracy theories are?

Right back atcha', shill. Loose your caboose from the government train and join free Americans. It's time to make ya mama proud.

BTW, over 68% of the people are fully vaccinated so there are many more of us ‘vaxhicans’ than believers in the covid conspiracy cult theories.

What percentage of Jim Jones' followers drank the kool-aid? Does that make them right? What if just one person had raised his voice to tell everybody that the kool-aid was poison and those people had NOT drank it? Would that have been a good thing or a bad thing?

But there would be Vaxway Duke to mock and ridicule the man and encourage them to drink away. See, a vaxhican is one who KNOWS there is overwhelming evidence that the kool-aid is poison and proceeds with his agitrop anyway. Which is what you are. The last of the vaxhicans. ESPECIALLY here on a forum such as this, where free-thinking people abide.

You are swimming uptide, CDC man. Even your masters are being exposed, and you will be hung out to dry without a paddle, to mix metaphors.

[SecAmndmt]

Of that 68%, many are not going for boosters. The vx rate here in TX was about 45% until the mandates. I bet you half or more of the ppl who took it wish they hadn’t.

[george76]

Covid vaxxes and their forced coercion will go down as the biggest scandal / worst medical crime ever committed.. ~German MP Christine Anderson.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4081159/posts

500 fired Health Care workers win $10.3 million settlement in covid mandate .. Chicago.

Houston Methodist is next.?

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4082002/posts

[DugwayDuke]

SecAmndmt wrote: “Of that 68%, many are not going for boosters.”

No, the 68% is fully vaccinated. That means boosted.

SecAmndmt wrote: “I bet you half or more of the ppl who took it wish they hadn’t.”

That’s a projection on your part. The vast majority of the population do not share your fear of the vaccines and are glad they’ve taken the shots. True, there are breakthrough infections, the shots are perfect, but even the breakthrough infections are much milder if vaccinated.

[DugwayDuke]

bagster wrote: “What percentage of Jim Jones’ followers drank the kool-aid?”

Almost all and they knew the kool-aid was poison.

But go ahead and pretend that you’re in the majority, that you’re so much smarter than those who took the vaccines. All of those are characteristics of members of a conspiracy cult.

[bagster]

Almost all and they knew the kool-aid was poison.

As usual, you miss the point, CDC man. You socialists were never big on logic. The overwhelming majority of the ignorant sheep drank the kool-aid, and you use that to illustrate the good of drinking it. It don't get no dumber than that logic.

Remember, it was one little kid that told the Emperor he had no clothes. And guess what. He didn't.

But go ahead and pretend that you’re in the majority,

I prefer to be in the right than in the majority, Mister last of the Vaxhicans.

that you’re so much smarter than those who took the vaccines.

This goes without saying.

All of those are characteristics of members of a conspiracy cult.

No, dear nerdling. Those are characteristics of a vastly superior intellect. Stings, don't it?

[TBall]

I call BS that 68% are fully vaccinated and boosted. Only my hard core leftist friends are out there getting boosted. Anyway, I got a new job a few months ago. At this new workplace they are seven employees including myself and only one of us has been vaccinated. None of the employees including myself has had Covid that we know of, but most have vaccinated family members who have had it. Just an observation, I’m not saying that it means anything.

[SecAmndmt]

You’re like a Biden infomercial. Or Liz Warren.

This is the cv19 vx map for Texas. The booster % in TX is about 33%.

I also notice that rural areas, which are conservative and Trump country, have very low vx rates. As low as 25%.

https://tabexternal.dshs.texas.gov/t/THD/views/COVID-19VaccineinTexasDashboard/Summary?%3Aembed=y&%3AisGuestRedirectFromVizportal=y

And moreover, Texans only got over 50% for the state when mandates were threatened by Biden.

So it is not projection. People are taking the shots because they feel forced to. And so far, no being forced to boost, they are declining them here.

[Clay Moore]

Just within my circle of friends, one lost a teenage kin about 48 hrs after the shot. These numbers are woefully low.

[grey_whiskers]

The false positive rate is about 5%. But the PCR test isn’t the sole determinant for Covid. There must also be covid symptoms for example.

Or in a pinch, a motorcycle wreck will do.

[logi_cal869]

[Usually_Disappointed]

even the breakthrough infections are much milder if vaccinated.

Prove it...

[grey_whiskers]

[grey_whiskers]

https://www.theepochtimes.com/cardiologist-spike-proteins-generated-by-covid-19-vaccines-are-toxic-to-heart_4716233.html?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=gettr

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

(From the article):" These findings should not come as a surprise though, because a confidential Pfizer document had already confirmed that
exposure to the mRNA injections was perfectly possible by skin-to-skin contact and breathing the same air as someone who had been given the Covid-19 jab." Aerosol and skin exposure means the more you hang around someone who has taken the shot voluntarily, the more likely that you have the graphene particles particles in your own system, INVOLUNTARILY ! Also, with this frequency, you are at greater risk of myocarditis, yourself. The people who mandated the "Experimental" mRNA shot as a condition of employment (Military, manufacturing, healthcare workers, teachers, etc.) should all be sued into oblivion including Fauxxi, Wuhan Virology Lab, N.C. State, Eco-Health Alliance, and all of Big Pharma for creating "gain of function" disease, as well as the vax. Fauxxi purposely and intentionally avoided all supervision and funded of an illegal medical process, and sent it "offshore", by design. In reality, no one will be held accountable.

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

(From the article):" These findings should not come as a surprise though, because a confidential Pfizer document had already confirmed that
exposure to the mRNA injections was perfectly possible by skin-to-skin contact and breathing the same air as someone who had been given the Covid-19 jab."

Aerosol and skin exposure means the more you hang around someone who has taken the shot voluntarily,
the more likely that you have the graphene particles particles in your own system, INVOLUNTARILY !

Also, with this frequency, you are at greater risk of myocarditis, yourself.
The people who mandated the "Experimental" mRNA shot as a condition of employment (Military, manufacturing, healthcare workers, teachers, etc.)
should all be sued into oblivion including Fauxxi, Wuhan Virology Lab, N.C. State, Eco-Health Alliance, and all of Big Pharma for creating "gain of function" disease, as well as the vax.
Fauxxi purposely and intentionally avoided all supervision and funded of an illegal medical process, and sent it "offshore", by design.

In reality, no one will be held accountable.

[Pelham]

Myocardial Complications of Immunisations
Annals of Clinical RFesearch 1978 Oct

Abstract

Immunisation may induce myocardial complications. In this pilot study clinical, electrocardiographic, chemical and immunological findings have been studied during a six weeks’ follow-up after routine immunisation (mumps, polio, tetanus, smallpox, diphtheria and type A meningococcal disease) among 234 Finnish conscripts at the beginning of their military service. Serial pattern of ECG changes suggestive of myocarditis was recorded in eight of the 234 conscripts one to two weeks after vaccination against smallpox and diphtheria. Changes were mainly minor ST segment elevations and T wave inversions and usually they disappeared in a few weeks. The ECG positives more often had a history of atopy, and their mean body temperatures and heart rates after the vaccinations were higher than among the other subjects (p less than 0.01). However, clinical myocarditis was never noted, nor were immunological or enzymological changes different among the ECG positives. Thus in 3% of the study population, evidence of postvaccinal myocarditis was noted, based on serial ECG patterns, but without any other evidence of cardiac disease.