Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Buttons12

What is particularly interesting is the effect the brief & remote border war Japan had with USSR in ‘39 had on the military’s eventual decision to settle on the IJN’s southern strategy, which was kicked off by the attack on PH.


19 posted on 10/07/2022 7:16:32 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: skeeter

Japan definitely got its nose bloodied by the bear in 1939.

Quite often in reading of this era, I’ve wondered, “What were they thinking!?” with regard to the northern strategy. You can’t just eat China. Korea, sure. China...nope. It’s a dog chasing a truck scenario.

However, their soldiers and pilots got a lot of practice out of it, and a few years later they were able to mop the floor with the British and Dutch in Malaysia, not to mention the natives.

What they needed to wage war was always in the south. To this day, the shipping lanes are potentially very problematic for China, and that’s in spite of pipeline technology.

I guess a lot of the military were suffering from the Maginot Line fallacy, looking backward to yesterday’s problems to guide them with today’s challenges.

But heck, they hadn’t even the people needed to take over any substantial piece of China. There were half a billion Chinese at the time, iirc. What were they thinking!


21 posted on 10/07/2022 7:37:00 AM PDT by Buttons12 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson