I follow Escabar and find him VERY credible. What I don’t find credible is “mediabiasfactcheck.”
BTW, when I just clicked on “mediabiasfactcheck” I got a “security alert” message saying they have viruses and I should scan my computer.
Your source works for Russian intelligence and the Defense Ministry of Russia....Just sayin.
“I follow Escabar and find him VERY credible.”
That’s because you are a fellow traveler.
Escobar is a notorious leftist, who is viscerally anti-west.
That’s why he is so well-received in such bastions of “objectivity” as Salon, the Huffington Post, The Nation, RT, Sputnik, The Real News, etc.
You find him credible because you see the world as he does.
Just as you find uber-leftist Sharon Tennison credible. A known apologist for Putin, and a fierce critic of NATO and supporter of Russia’s invasion and annexation of Crimea, Tennison is what in the old Soviet days was known as a “useful idiot.”
Your bias towards Russia and your animosity towards the United States is readily apparent. When votes come up in the UN condemning Russia’s actions you make snide comments to the effect that the only reason parties voted for the condemnation is because the United States bribed them. Per your post #32 on 12/21/2022: “And there wouldn’t even have been the whole 82 who voted yes had it not been for the fact that we bribe and threaten countries to support our positions at the UN.”
Be an adult, Katya, and admit your bias.