Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jonty30

IMO, the war was principally one of economics in that the North wanted to keep agricultural South as its own for better terms, dictated prices and in a captive-producer situation. They didn’t want the South to sell produce to other countries and their majority legislation made it difficult for the South.

To complicate things, slavery was used as moral tool even through the majority of farmers, etc. in the South didn’t own them - couldn’t afford them. Slavey was for big plantations and rich Southerners.

To have a Second Civil War today would be difficult because there isn’t just one Ft. Sumpter. There are dozens. Name any Democrat city in the South.


23 posted on 12/28/2023 1:06:57 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer
I like your thinking. The vast majority of southerners didnt own slaves. And you cant prove all southerners fought to "help out" a tiny minority of rich southerners to keep their slaves.

otoh you cannot ignore south carolinas declaration of indepence specifically names slavery as a key reason for their leaving the union.

The civil war didnt happen over night, nor was it just about the outlawing of slavery.

Ill just say if the south would have known what was going to happen, they would have picked their own cotton.

And if they had, the north would have still tried to crush the southern states will to be independent of northern rule thru legislation and economic strangulation.

28 posted on 12/28/2023 1:21:35 AM PST by Ikeon (I stopped going to my family doctor whenever I felt sick. I've never been healthier. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson