Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did a 1997 merger ruin Boeing?
Finshots ^ | Jan 2024

Posted on 03/16/2024 7:44:34 AM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege

…Yeah, things aren’t looking good for the plane manufacturer. And we must ask — where did it all go so wrong for Boeing?

Well, it probably all began in the summer of 1997.

Boeing wanted to establish dominance and show the world who was boss in the airline industry. So it decided to acquire another plane manufacturer called McDonnell Douglas. It was a massive merger worth $14 billion.

Now after the merger, the new entity retained the Boeing name. It was expected since it was Boeing that splashed the cash. But the problem was that the culture of McDonnell Douglas seeped in. And that changed the face of Boeing completely.

See, the Boeing of the pre-merger era was called an ‘engineers’ company’. The ones who made these flying machines called the shots. Costs didn’t matter and it was only quality and design that did. They wanted to ensure that only their best ideas took to the skies. Safety was paramount. And the Chief Financial Officer who was answerable to Wall Street about costs didn’t care much about trying to impress the bankers either.

But after the merger, everything changed.

The CEO of McDonnell Douglas actually became the CEO of Boeing. A chairman with no aviation background, but who’d worked in General Electric, was also appointed. The company started paying attention to creating shareholder value which was hardly a priority earlier. And as one article put it, “Now, a passion for great planes was replaced with a passion for affordability.” Boeing even turned to outsourcing critical operations. Sure, it made the balance sheet ‘asset light’, but, it came at the cost of quality…

(Excerpt) Read more at finshots.in ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: agitprop; boeing; generalelectric; india; mcdonnelldouglas; mergers; passingthebuck; twa800
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: CondoleezzaProtege

Boeing’s problem is that its focus on quality was replaced by corporate fascism as its business model. Buying politicians like Lindsey Graham and Nimrata Haley became more important than building high quality aircraft. THE END.


61 posted on 03/16/2024 10:25:39 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

GE managers had a term for it: “”Rank and Yank”. They were required to rank their direct reports from best to worst and then fire the bottom 10%. Refuse and guess where you’d end up on YOUR bosses ranking?

Officially known as “top-grading”.


62 posted on 03/16/2024 10:59:09 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: erlayman
United is moving towards Airbus which is the best possible solution for both companies.

You have some Germans working at Airbus so I assume that's why the quality is better.

Remember American car companies under UAW are terrible. (Japanese cars without UAW make excellent vehicles in USA).

63 posted on 03/16/2024 11:04:09 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

Had the same reaction to Microsoft advertising for Windows Vista. Told clients, “Let’s skip this.” Everybody said, “OK!”


64 posted on 03/16/2024 11:06:22 AM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

“Shareholder value” should not be the only consideration for a corporate merger, if the company is proud of that they do and want to keep it that way. A board of directors has the longest term value and respect of the company to consider, not just what would satisfy Wall Street immediately.


65 posted on 03/16/2024 12:09:33 PM PDT by Wuli (ena)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

It is amazing how many experts there are on this thread, all seeming to have inside and thorough knowledge of exactly what “ails Boeing.” A bit of perspective:

Boeing is not “ruined.” The tragic crashes of two 737s a few years ago were due to one software issue plus inadequate pilot training. In other words, they could have been avoided. In fact, the crash of one of those planes was actually avoided the day before, because a third pilot in the cockpit knew what to do. The

The door plug was definitely Boeing’s fault. That was a one-off, unfortunate incident. But the other recent incidents were caused by human error or poor maintenance. That is the responsibility of the airlines, not Boeing’s.

In the long haul, Boeing will do just fine. Having worked there for 32 years as an electrical engineer, I worked with dozens and dozens of great people, and I can think of just one (a contractor) who I felt was incapable of doing their job. In addition, Boeing has thousands of planes in the pipeline: as of May 2023, 4,634 of all models to be exact. And at any point in time there are thousands of Boeing airplanes plying the skies worldwide. If you compare the negative incidents on these airplanes with what happens to cars, it is not even close. Air travel is much safer. Why? Because the testing airplanes go through to ensure safety at certification are incredible rigorous.

So is Boeing “ruined”? Not even close. They will go through some difficult times as most big companies do. But they will continue to make great, safe, fuel-efficent, comfortable airplanes. Really.


66 posted on 03/16/2024 12:29:34 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: impactplayer

While G.E. works on 3 year plans the Chi-coms work 100 year plans.


67 posted on 03/16/2024 12:35:12 PM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: princeofdarkness

Good question.

At that time Ira was probably developing his “skills.” There are analytics that attend to any business that require thought patterns alien to the simple man.

It really came as a disappointment to me that he turned out as he did.


68 posted on 03/16/2024 12:36:19 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (In a world of parrots and lemmings, be a watchdog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Glennb51

The same thing happened when Allied Signal bought Honeywell.

*********

and airResearch when I worked there making airplane engine parts. Allied ruind them


69 posted on 03/16/2024 5:48:21 PM PDT by mcatch22 (Socialism: You're what's for dinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

“In the long haul, Boeing will do just fine.”

It has been a long haul already, and Boeing is circling the drain. The Max is a dismal financial failure, the 777X canceled, production lines shut down, quality sucks out loud to the point even the easy tanker program has failed. The damned thing does little of what it was supposed to do.

Boeing is living on the works of others decades ago, but it has little talent left to go forward and that gets worse the more white men are expelled from the company with their “Diversity”.


70 posted on 03/16/2024 7:31:56 PM PDT by CodeToad (Rule #1: The elites want you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

“So is Boeing “ruined”? Not even close.”

Boeing stock price says otherwise.


71 posted on 03/16/2024 7:33:32 PM PDT by CodeToad (Rule #1: The elites want you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Stock prices go up and down. They do not mean a company is “ruined.” Or maybe you think the company will go out of business? Not likely, since it is a huge manufacturer and the largest US the exporter.


72 posted on 03/16/2024 8:37:15 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

So you think they are going to go out of business? Hm…not likely at all.


73 posted on 03/16/2024 8:38:03 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

#21 You explained what is happening to the last company I worked at. New management came in and rearranged the deck chairs. Either they will go or the company will be bought out.


74 posted on 03/16/2024 10:11:33 PM PDT by minnesota_bound (Need more money to buy everything now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mcatch22

They sent a lot of the machining from the 404 building to mexico. It was sent back on the average of three times. They would have saved money keeping it in house.


75 posted on 03/16/2024 10:18:28 PM PDT by Glennb51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound
Jack Welch was said to have fired 250,000 people during his time at GE. That is an entire city of people. There are others like him such as "Chainsaw" Al and Mitt Romney. Top 10 Worst Bosses - "Chainsaw" Al https://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2025898_2025900_2026107,00.html Jack Welch https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/21/business/jack-welch-ge-ceo-behavior.html Almost immediately after Mr. Welch retired in September 2001 with a $417 million severance package, G.E. went into a tailspin from which it would never recover. His pupils, though, went on to run dozens of other major companies, including Home Depot, Albertson’s, Chrysler and Boeing. Most of them failed. G.E. was an industrial company when he took over — making most of its money selling appliances, light bulbs, power turbines and jet engines. By the time he retired, the company derived much of its profit from GE Capital, which was essentially a giant unregulated bank. READ THIS PART: More than any company besides G.E., it was Boeing that was most directly shaped by Mr. Welch. Over the past 25 years, a succession of men who worked for Mr. Welch refashioned the airplane maker’s culture to resemble G.E.’s, transforming a company that once made a priority of aeronautical engineering into one that thrived on financial engineering. “When people say I changed the culture of Boeing, that was the intent, so it’s run like a business rather than a great engineering firm,” Mr. Stonecipher said in 2004. “It is a great engineering firm, but people invest in a company because they want to make money.”
76 posted on 03/16/2024 10:47:30 PM PDT by minnesota_bound (Need more money to buy everything now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

Same was said of Kodak.
Same was said of Blockbuster.
Same was said of K-mart.

Same was said of many companies that have been displaced.

Boeing is on an extinction path.


77 posted on 03/17/2024 5:41:42 AM PDT by CodeToad (Rule #1: The elites want you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

78 posted on 03/17/2024 5:47:01 AM PDT by CodeToad (Rule #1: The elites want you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

Boeing employs ~145,000 people. In the past 15 years they have laid off about that many, and those are just the WARN required reporting numbers. The number of layoffs amounting to 50-150 people at a time are unknown but happen several times a year in various divisions and do not required a WARN notice.

Boeing just killed off their entire R&D department of ~50 people in one of the divisions and laid off another 30 people or so. These are unreported layoffs, of course, but common at Boeing. There are only a few older white males left and this layoff took out many of the key people left.

Shaping the company is about removing older white males. Entire offices are filled with Indians and women. For DEI, they even have “Chief of Staff” (COS) positions for every director and VP now. These positions are political commissars, all are women and all are liberals. Imagine a liberal women who no engineering and no aviation experience, and little real -world experience, being given authority over chief engineers. That has now happened at Boeing.


79 posted on 03/17/2024 5:59:52 AM PDT by CodeToad (Rule #1: The elites want you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Totally different situations.

So for the record, you believe Boeing will go completely out of business. And if so, when?


80 posted on 03/17/2024 7:34:54 AM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson