Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Chad C. Mulligan

The loss of power (not loss of propulsion) resulted in the loss of hydraulics, and thus loss of control of the ship. If they had maintained power after the first outage, they may have had time to recover...but they lost power again. As it is, they were able to slow the ship in Back Emergency, down to 1.5 knots at the time of the collision.


100 posted on 03/26/2024 11:22:08 PM PDT by rottndog (What comes after America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: rottndog
The loss of power (not loss of propulsion) resulted in the loss of hydraulics....

That makes sense if the rudder were moved hydraulically, (almost a certainty) and if the hydraulic pressure source were electric. Also highly likely that the rudder control is an electro-hydraulic servo system.

'Swelp me, I'd never want to be on a ship that had no redundancy of hydraulic pump or generator, but who knows?

From my machine tool days in the '70s I know that hydraulic servos have nasty ways of going haywire, so I'd want a manually operable backup rudder valve.

I've read that WW2 destroyers used chain falls for emergency rudder control, but it would take one helluva chain fall and a team of ten or twenty men to do it for a container ship that size.

102 posted on 03/26/2024 11:48:35 PM PDT by Chad C. Mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson