To: JoSixChip
What was the strategic purpose of this attack?
It doesn’t help win the war.
To: packagingguy
What was the strategic purpose of this attack?
Same thing terrorist always aim for, generate terror in the victims.
8 posted on
03/28/2024 8:54:37 AM PDT by
JoSixChip
(2020: The year of unreported truths; 2021: My main take away from this year? Trust no one.)
To: packagingguy
“win the war”? The proxy war has been lost for a very long time. This was done and it’s beginning to appear successfully so, to widen the war to NATO (sans the proxy aspect)vs. Russia so we can “win” WWIII. Yeah, DC is that reckless and stupid.
14 posted on
03/28/2024 9:13:44 AM PDT by
hardspunned
(Former DC GOP globalist stooge)
To: packagingguy
The strategic purpose of this attack was to take the fight to the Russian people to make them feel the pain of the war and demonstrate to them that they were not immune from the consequences of the war.
Victoria Nuland alluded to this in a recent press conference where she said that the recent re commitment to Ukraine was going to result in asymmetric attacks inside of Russia itself
16 posted on
03/28/2024 9:19:41 AM PDT by
rdcbn1
To: packagingguy
What was the strategic purpose of this attack?That's the lens to use to understand.
This attack served exactly ZERO purpose for Ukraine.
Putin needed something to rally the troops.
Yet again, False Flag anyone? Also see Reichstag fire.
Doesn't anyone read or study history anymore? To be fair some FReepers including you packagingguy clearly do -- but most people don't.
26 posted on
03/28/2024 11:01:50 AM PDT by
piytar
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson