The Republican's original bill would have failed a court challenge. Noem put a temp restriction in place until they could re-write the bill and then she signed it into law.
She's done really good things for SD including signing Constitutional Carry into law...
RINO's gonna bitch about real conservatives though... So here we go...
GOOD POINT!!
The democrats use such new laws that WILL NOT pass scrutiny to perform their “repeal to a new position” tactic.
Say that there is a current law A.
They want to change the law, so they propose a new law B, which is the opposite of what they really want...but they write it so badly that it won’t survive court challenge.
Then they ‘repeal’ it by court order.
But that does not mean they go back to A, they interpret the judges decision as meaning that if B is unconstitutional then the OPPOSITE of b must be true- which become the new law C, which is what they wanted all along.
That’s how they got gay marriage.
She’s done really good things for SD including signing Constitutional Carry into law...
Even that is not free of controversy.
SD Gunowners, worked for over twenty years to get that bill passed. So a former Speaker of the House gets hired by the NRA as the State Coordinator and it passes like you know what through a goose. The NRA had zip to do with it throughout the twenty years of effort but were more than willing to take credit for the maybe two years there guy was coordinating.
In retrospect, SD Gunowners can care less about credit for passage. The are pleased that it has, but they know the effort expended and the time that has passed without success.