Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MtnClimber

Iran did exactly what it told the U.S. and Israel in advance what it was going to do (below is the article from The Financial Times which is behind a paywall). This was calibrated to show only a reaction to the illegal attack by Israel on the consulate in Damascus. Iran specifically targeted nothing but military targets and used easily shot down, at a hugely expensive cost, drones and lesser missiles. That being said, Iran did commit apparently a few of its hypersonic missiles which evaded all Israeli air defense and hit the Nevatim air base. Iran, seeking to avoid, as it has all along, a war that would drag the U.S. in, is giving Israel the opportunity to stand down. Israel and its stooges are allowed to crow all they want about shooting down those throwaway assets Iran committed if it stops the escalation.

Again, if this were a determined Iranian attack, why on earth would they tell everyone involved with what, when and where the “attack” would occur?

https://www.ft.com/content/bdbc3ad0-376e-486f-a0be-fd6eea975d20


5 posted on 04/14/2024 11:40:11 AM PDT by hardspunned (Former DC GOP globalist stooge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hardspunned

Because they were scared shitless Israel would strike back twice as hard.

You live in your own reality. Entertaining though.


6 posted on 04/14/2024 12:11:26 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Guns don't kill people, Democrats do. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: hardspunned
I am sure you won't mind a BS Flag being thrown on the field?

1. Slow-moving 44 pound warhead drones are the easiest-hit, least damaging, lowest explosive yield weapon fired yesterday. Missiles, particularly ballistic missiles, are not "lesser missiles" - they are faster, more precise, and have far higher payloads and are far more expensive.

2. So, where and when did the Iranians announce that they would be "only firing on military targets in Israel"? Were they speaking about their Houthis and Hezbollah buddies who were firing up a storm last night too? I saw interceptions taking place over Jerusalem - and are there "military targets" there?

I was kind of hoping they'd hit the Dome of the Rock.

3. Hypersonic missiles? Really? As far as anyone knows the Iranians don't have them. Only the Russians, the Chinese and maybe us.

4."Israel and its stooges?" Not at all biased/antisemitic, are you?

5. If we had an actual president and an actual Nation Security Council and Military leadership, this would have the perfect opening to finally take out their known nuclear and ballistic missile fabrication sites and cut the head off the snake before they a have nuclear weapon employment capability - or are you hoping that they get them?

7 posted on 04/14/2024 12:12:37 PM PDT by Chainmail (How do I feel about ignorance and apathy? I don't know and I don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: hardspunned

It’s you again, hardfxxxed! To provide us not only with you wisdom on all things Ukraine, but on Israel vs Iran, as well. Getting paid twice?


11 posted on 04/14/2024 1:09:20 PM PDT by exinnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: hardspunned

*Illegal* attack? Is there a law that prohibits attacks on embassies?

And are you going to condemn Iran’s attacks on embassies over the years? Or just show your anti-Semitism and condemn anyone who fights back against islamists.


14 posted on 04/14/2024 1:39:00 PM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson