Posted on 04/18/2024 7:21:05 AM PDT by dennisw
The nurse in Germany jabbed up to 8,600 elderly people with ~saline solution The nurse administered the fake vaccines and left people without protection The defendant shared anti-vaxxer posts on social media during the pandemic
Antje T jabbed up to 8,600 patients who were mainly hospital employees, educators and doctors above the age of 70 between March 5 and April 2021, leaving them with no protection against the deadly virus.
Police told the court that she was able to introduce the saline solution undetected, because she was in charge of vaccine and syringe preparation during her shift at the vaccination centre.
But after more than a month she was reported by another employee who saw her use the saline solution instead of the vaccine on six patients on April 21, 2021.
The 39-year-old had additionally posted several social media posts where she openly emphasized her skeptical views regarding COVID-19 vaccines.
When questioned by police, she admitted to using saline solution but had said she only did it because she had accidentally broken a vial containing six shots and was ashamed to tell her colleagues.
She had also claimed that it was a one-time incident, but was immediately sacked after antibody tests that were carried out on the affected people confirmed authorities' suspicions.
An anti-vaxxer nurse who injected up to 8,600 elderly people with saline solution instead of a Covid-19 vaccine has walked free from court.
Red Cross nurse Antje T, 39, jabbed thousands of elderly patients at a vaccine centre in Germany with what she told them was the BioNTech Pfizer vaccine but was just a saltwater solution.
The nurse, who administered the fake vaccines at the Schortens jab centre in Friesland, northwest Germany, was given just six months on probation.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
If you compare how a Covid death was determined, you’d understand otherwise. A friend of mine in the healthcare field said just about anything was attributed to Covid as cause of death to boost the numbers. Such as a lady being treated for end of life/cancer who contracted Covid in the hospital and was listed as a Covid death although the cancer was about to take her at any moment. It’s all contrived. As I mentioned, everyone I know of who died of Covid was vaccinated.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “You made the claim and then cited the CDC and Unscientific Anti-American as the source. Again, prove your claim.”
Nice game you play. One can only prove using sources approved by you. Sorry, life doesn’t work that way.
sevinufnine wrote: “If you compare how a Covid death was determined, you’d understand otherwise.”
No, I don’t understand ‘otherwise’. The anti-vaxxer narrative declares that only those who die with no comorbidies can be considered a covid caused death.
Try convince a judge that someone shot who has high blood pressure died from the high blood pressure and not the bullet.
zeugma wrote: “I speak for enough. Over the 26 years, that I have been here, I’ve seen enough shills, bots, and grifters to be able to identify them at a distance.”
Obviously not. Otherwise you’d identify the anti-vaxxers ‘shills, bots, and grifters’ for what they are. For example, almost all of the anti-vaxxer heros so often revered on FR are profitting from the snake oil rememdies they market. Others make a living posting click bait claims designed to lure the naive to their websites and are compensated by advertisers for those visits.
Really? Proof requires verification and the circular "proof" back to the CDC validating itself is fiction.
You made the claims that the virus has killed millions and that the "vaccine" has saved millions. Prove those statements with verifiable sources - and no, the corrupt CDC, whose head admitted publicly to lying, is not a verifiable source.
I visited websites listing the adverse effects of pneumonia, flu, and shingles vaccines as injection site soreness, fever and chills, fatigue, muscle aches, severe allergic reaction, decreased appetite, nasal congestion, chest pain, fast/irregular heartbeat, seizures, headache, stomach pain, and nausea. Looks to me that you could go to work the next day.
However, those for COVID 19 vaccines were numerous and disturbing, but did you ever hear a warning like you hear on television whenever a drug company touts a new drug? No, of course not. The vaccines were a fraud from day one and the three letter agencies participated in it. Here are three more indications the government ignored the available information.
V-SAFE DATA
https://icandecide.org/v-safe-data/
LOTS OF VERIFIABLE CASES OF VACCINE ADVERSE EFFECTS AND DEATHS
https://ugetube.com/watch/lots-of-verifiable-cases-of-vaccine-adverse-effects-and-deaths-mp4_vB8amZSYmlxkPex.html
Dr. Mark Trozzi: 1000 peer reviewed articles on “Vaccine” injuries
https://drtrozzi.org/2023/09/28/1000-peer-reviewed-articles-on-vaccine-injuries/
I had been tracking this virus using the John Hopkins site for about two years using an Excel spreadsheet. The Scandinavian countries, and particularly Sweden, did not disturb their population to near the extend the US did. As of February 22, 2023, virus deaths per million for the megalopolis found in the combined states of Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Connecticut was twice that of Sweden, which has a similar disproportion in population makeup between urban and rural. For all of the US it is 41% less. You can verify this information by using the John Hopkin’s site and latest population figures.
LOL!!!! Nothing even close to the same thing. I’m speaking of a woman in hospice care, literally at death’s door. I’ve had high blood pressure for over a decade and it’s managed. If I was shot, ya...it would be the bullet. Not the blood pressure.
Don’t assume I’m an anti-vax idiot. Just not foolish enough to believe something pushed out on to the public without being fully vetted can do what they say when there’s nothing at all to back up the claims. If you can show me a control group of a few thousand with equal physical issues and/or healthy. Give all of one the shot, and not the other, then you and I could come to terms on what this RNA shot is really able to do or not. I think that’s fair enough yes?
CDC: Cause-of-Death Section of the Death Certificate
www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/blue_form.pdf
sevinufnine wrote: “If you can show me a control group of a few thousand with equal physical issues and/or healthy. Give all of one the shot, and not the other, then you and I could come to terms on what this RNA shot is really able to do or not. I think that’s fair enough yes?”
There were over 46 thousand in the Phase III trials.
Retain Mike wrote: “However, those for COVID 19 vaccines were numerous and disturbing, but did you ever hear a warning like you hear on television whenever a drug company touts a new drug? No, of course not.”
You need to pay more attention to the drug warnings on TV. I see warnings about blood cloths and possible deaths.
“In terms of COVID-19 side effects, responsible doctors treated Covid-19 with regimens using Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine at a fraction of the cost of shots.”
Just because ‘responsible doctors’ treated patients with Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine does not mean that such treatmens cured those patients since many infected with COVID improve without any treatment.
BTW, one of those ‘respected doctors’, America’s Frontline Doctors, is Stella Immanuel who has claimed many health issues is caused by having sex with demons. Stella wrote more more prescriptions for Ivermectin (32,000) and HCQ (69,000) than any other physician in 2021.
Stella has also claimed that said space alien DNA is used in medical treatments and that “reptilian spirits” and other extraterrestrials run the U.S. government. She also said Illuminati are using witches to destroy the world through abortion, gay marriage, children’s toys, and media, including Harry Potter, Pokémon, Wizards of Waverly Place and Hannah Montana. She said scientists are developing vaccines to stop people from being religious.
I think we are through here. I just cannot compete with your popular media sources.
Asking questions in response to assertions is a tactic NOT an argument.
All things classified as a vaccine in the past would satisfy the definition. That’s why they were called vaccines. You see before raw politics took over science and reason and every damn thing else people were generally rational. The definition of a vaccine served well until the monsters realized they weren’t getting away with calling their tech a vaccine. So they did what Stalin et al would have done and changed the definition.
TalBlack wrote: “Asking questions in response to assertions is a tactic NOT an argument. All things classified as a vaccine in the past would satisfy the definition.”
The intent of my argument was to clarify your position.
In effect, you’re claiming that a substance must be 100% effective in preventing infections and 100% effective in prevening transmission to be considered a vaccine. If that is your definition then there has never been a vaccine since all known vaccines have less than 100% effectiveness.
This is exactly why the definition was changed, to make it clear that something didn’t have to be 100% effective to be considered a vaccine.
Here’s an explanation.
“What CDC did, and vaccine skeptics and others like to make an enormous deal of for no reason, is refine the operational definition of a vaccine. Nothing about their new set of words put in a particular order to define vaccination is wrong. Vaccines are not 100% safe, and they are not 100% effective, but they are safer by orders of magnitude and more effective by orders of magnitude than the alternatives to dealing with infectious pathogens.”
“At the end of the day, the definition of vaccine or vaccination has not changed. It is still the material used (vaccine) or the act of using that material (vaccination) to give advanced knowledge of an infectious pathogen to the immune system so that, if the real pathogen appears, the immune system can clear it as fast as possible, hopefully preventing disease. If, suddenly, everyone in the world understood the word “vaccine” to be a type of tree or a species of cat, then we’d have a change in definition”
“In effect, you’re claiming that a substance must be 100% …”
Nope. You came up with that. A vaccine was a vaccine for everyone on the planet earth until it suddenly wasn’t and purely political exigencies required redefinition. Straight out of 1984.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.