Posted on 04/18/2024 7:21:05 AM PDT by dennisw
The nurse in Germany jabbed up to 8,600 elderly people with ~saline solution The nurse administered the fake vaccines and left people without protection The defendant shared anti-vaxxer posts on social media during the pandemic
Antje T jabbed up to 8,600 patients who were mainly hospital employees, educators and doctors above the age of 70 between March 5 and April 2021, leaving them with no protection against the deadly virus.
Police told the court that she was able to introduce the saline solution undetected, because she was in charge of vaccine and syringe preparation during her shift at the vaccination centre.
But after more than a month she was reported by another employee who saw her use the saline solution instead of the vaccine on six patients on April 21, 2021.
The 39-year-old had additionally posted several social media posts where she openly emphasized her skeptical views regarding COVID-19 vaccines.
When questioned by police, she admitted to using saline solution but had said she only did it because she had accidentally broken a vial containing six shots and was ashamed to tell her colleagues.
She had also claimed that it was a one-time incident, but was immediately sacked after antibody tests that were carried out on the affected people confirmed authorities' suspicions.
An anti-vaxxer nurse who injected up to 8,600 elderly people with saline solution instead of a Covid-19 vaccine has walked free from court.
Red Cross nurse Antje T, 39, jabbed thousands of elderly patients at a vaccine centre in Germany with what she told them was the BioNTech Pfizer vaccine but was just a saltwater solution.
The nurse, who administered the fake vaccines at the Schortens jab centre in Friesland, northwest Germany, was given just six months on probation.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Fighting Falcon wrote: “Please let me know if you have evidence to refute one of his arguments found here:”
I don’t waste my time watching videos.
Here’s an article on McCullough and his false claims.
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-covid-19-vaccine-holocaust-the-latest-antivaccine-messaging/
Flavious_Maximus wrote: “How do you know? It cannot be proven, plain and simple. The fact is that the vaccine is NOT an inoculation. It does NOT protect you from getting COVID and it does not prevent you from giving COVID to others. It is a gigantic scam, just like the Climate hoax. The CDC is a propaganda organ of the democrat death cult. /spit”
Name three vaccines that are 100% effective in preventing infections or preventing transmission.
Name three vaccines that killed and maimed as many people as the frankenshot that weren’t pulled back by the FDA since the institution came into being.
TalBlack wrote: “Then how come they had to change the definition of the word vaccine after this idiotic not a vaccine came along. Your saying it doesn’t make it so.”
What were the changes and why are those changes important?
T.B. Yoits wrote: “Again, prove it. Let’s see the numbers.”
How do you know? It cannot be proven, plain and simple.
DD is our resident propaganda slurper.
D.D. I do not know what world you are living in, but I prefer mine.
Just for Fun! Article by Professor Angus Dalgleish..... Angus Dalgleish is an expert in immunology and Professor of Oncology at St George's Hospital Medical School, London. massive-cancer-deaths-study-vindicates-my-warnings-over-covid-boosters
snip...." Others gave in to the bullying of the NHS and GPs who hounded them with texts and calls (which I myself received regularly) about the importance of having a booster even though they presented no evidence that it could be beneficial. Indeed in my judgement there was none, and only ever speculative and specious. Having worked in vaccine development for a decade I remembered an adage that if a vaccine needs a booster, it doesn’t work!"
...snip.... "What concerned me too was that they were boosting against a virus that had long since left the planet so, at the very least, it would do no good but more likely do harm, inducing immune responses that would be positively harmful and enhance susceptibility to infections with other viruses/variants, as has exactly turned out to be the case. This is not merely anecdotal. Despite several attempts to deny its conclusions and claim it has been misinterpreted, this Cleveland study (Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine ) indisputably shows a greater than threefold increase in covid infections in those who were boosted. A large-scale Israeli research study reported in the BMJ at the end of 2021 had already found a significantly increased risk of covid infection after the second vaccine dose. Its significance was ignored. Perversely, the authors concluded that this negative efficacy might warrant a third dose."
...snip..."However, last week an amazing paper from Japan was published. It was available on a pre-publication server last year but now it has been peer-reviewed and published in Cureus. Titled Increased age adjusted cancer mortality after the third mRNA lipid nanoparticle vaccine dose during the COVID pandemic in Japan, it is authored by Miki Gibo and colleagues. It is an enormous study and compares the full official statistics by annual and monthly age adjusted mortality rates (AMR) for the years 2020, 2021 and 2022 with regression analysis. The results are astounding. It shows there was a deficit for all cancers in the year 2020 when the first and second covid waves occurred. In 2021 there was an excess of deaths of 2.2 per cent and a 1.1 per cent increase in cancers. However, by 2022 the excess deaths had increased 9.6 per cent and cancer by 2.1 per cent. This paper was completed and published before the 2023 figures release which will almost certainly be much worse. What is remarkable here is that we are talking mortality, that is deaths from cancer not incidence of it." snip More at link.
Yep, it worked so well that you needed what? Five boosters? No thanks.
Anticipating your argument....."Oh, Everyone just put off seeing doctors until after Covid restrictions were over and were diagnosed later with cancer and tragically died. If true that means that the people who instituted the covid restrictions were responsible, and not the shots. Go ahead and believe that along with the rest of the "Vaccine Boosters" if you want. Young people are dying all over the place as a result of this shot, but gaslight away if you want.
Repeating your lie will never make it true. They didn’t care if you died in a car accident. If you tested positive, it was counted as a covid death.
In my state, they counted people who died in hospice as covid for deaths. You can keep posting your silly little links all you want.
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “ I do not know what world you are living in, but I prefer mine.”
No evidence COVID-19 vaccines have caused increase in cancers, contrary to claims made on social media
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N2UM24J/
“Severe COVID-19, death lowest by far among vaccinated Canadians”
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/severe-covid-19-death-lowest-far-among-vaccinated-canadians
Cancer rate not up 20 times from COVID-19 vaccines
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-228836931193
BTW, all most all vaccines require boosters to maintain effectiveness.
roving wrote: “In my state, they counted people who died in hospice as covid for deaths. You can keep posting your silly little links all you want.”
When did they start?
How long did they do this?
Have they corrected their numbers?
Have you noticed how often any death mentioned on FR is immediately classified as a result of the vaccine?
Try again. That’s from Unscientific Anti-American and it’s from 2022.
The changes were bullshit. The definition was futzed include the non vaccine that they were falsely calling a vaccine . So being lying falsifiers they changed the definition.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “Try again. That’s from Unscientific Anti-American and it’s from 2022.”
It doesn’t matter. You’ll deny any data that disputes your preferred anti-vaccine narrative.
TalBlack wrote: “The changes were bullshit. The definition was futzed include the non vaccine that they were falsely calling a vaccine . So being lying falsifiers they changed the definition.”
Please name three vaccines that satisfied the old definition.
nobody here is buying the garbage you are selling.Thank God
zeugma wrote: “nobody here is buying the garbage you are selling.Thank God”
You don’t speak for everyone here at FR. The anti-vaxxer contingent here at FR is small, but very vocal.
Again, prove your claim.
I speak for enough. Over the 26 years, that I have been here, I've seen enough shills, bots, and grifters to be able to identify them at a distance. Your shilling here for people that have literally murdered hundreds of thousands of people, if not millions, is so over the top, pathetic, and shrill at this point that it would be comical if it weren't so transparent and sad. You're not even a good troll anymore.
What is really funny is that after all this time there are may be 5 rabidly pro-death-jabbers left. You couldn't even field a baseball team. It's hilarious and pathetic
The Covid disease (such that it was) was a scam to get everyone fearful and become hypochondriacs. So that they would clamor to get injected multiple times with Pfizer etc vaccines aka clot shots.
Same as the climate scam relies on the sheeple becoming hypochondriacs and full of fear. So that they drive EVs and accept trillions in taxation, trillions in socialist spending to solve a non-problem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.