Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: exDemMom

I think the idea is that hydrogen would be for energy storage and transport, not an energy source in itself. In particular it would be a good way to store energy generated during times when people aren’t using much electricity, like at night. You’d use the excess power for hydrolysis and store the resulting hydrogen for use in vehicles with fuel cells. It seems like a good way to match supply with demand, ideally with nuclear as the energy source. IMO the problem would be in the mechanics of handling pressurized hydrogen but I get the impression that it’s a manageable problem.


35 posted on 04/22/2024 11:42:59 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Yardstick

I recall that the big hype back in the 1990s was that it would be a source of energy, not an energy storage system.

As energy storage, if we could address the problems of hydrogen flammability and storage, the idea of fuel cells is a little more reasonable.


48 posted on 04/23/2024 1:40:16 PM PDT by exDemMom (Dr. exDemMom, infectious disease and vaccines research specialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson