Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EXPERTS AGREE: TURBO CANCERS ARE CAUSED BY THE TOXIC MRNA COVID-19 JABS
THEHIGHWIRE ^ | Updated 5:47 AM EDT, Mon April 22, 2024 | By Tracy Beanz & Michelle Edwards

Posted on 04/22/2024 10:54:47 AM PDT by airdalecheif

We are hearing the term “Turbo Cancer” more and more often. What does Turbo Cancer mean? The phrase, which is essentially a long-term effect of the COVID-19 jabs, describes the long list of aggressive cancers that are rising at a record pace in COVID-19-vaccinated individuals.

(Lot's more info at the link)

(Excerpt) Read more at thehighwire.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: bigpharma; bigpharmatrollsmad; cancer; clickbaitadspam; covid; frindecline; garbagetrolls; qtardclowns; qtardgarbage; qtrollclowns; qvirus; thefakewire; turboavbraindamage; turbocancer; vaccines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: DugwayDuke
Why not demand proof from these ‘experts’ cited in the article?

Because your claim demands that I put some foreign substance into my body. Their claims require no such thing, and I can afford to wait on their claims.

If you want me to put those shots into my body, then you need to prove that they are safe. Claims of "unsafe" merely requires I do nothing.

So again--prove it, or shut up.

61 posted on 04/23/2024 10:51:35 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

ShadowAce wrote: “Because your claim demands that I put some foreign substance into my body. Their claims require no such thing, and I can afford to wait on their claims.”

Where did I demand anything of you?
Why do you accept these claims from these grifters?


62 posted on 04/23/2024 11:00:20 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
...AMONG OTHER THINGS!!


63 posted on 04/23/2024 11:09:13 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Your insistence that these shots are "safe and effective" are meant to reassure people to go ahead and take the shot. Your continued insistence (across multiple threads) of this claim constitutes a demand.

What makes you think I accept any claim from anyone else? I just told you in my previous post that I can afford to wait on their claims, as doing nothing does not mean I accept any claim at all.

Again--since you claim these are "safe and effective" you need to prove your claim. Once (if) you manage to do that, then I will take another look at their claims--with the same cynical eye.

64 posted on 04/23/2024 11:12:10 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

ShadowAce wrote: “Your insistence that these shots are “safe and effective” are meant to reassure people to go ahead and take the shot. Your continued insistence (across multiple threads) of this claim constitutes a demand.”

My only demand is that claims that the vaccines are dangerous be supported by facts rather than emotion.


65 posted on 04/23/2024 11:18:13 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
My only demand is that claims that the vaccines are dangerous be supported by facts rather than emotion.

OK--Does that include your acknowledgement that the word "vaccine" was redefined after these shots were released so that they can be referred to as a "vaccine?"

66 posted on 04/23/2024 11:21:39 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Dich Bachert wrote: “AMONG OTHER THINGS (autism unheard of in the Amish”

Well, chalk that up to another bit of Tucker Carlon misinformation:

https://imfar.confex.com/imfar/2010/webprogram/Paper7336.html

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-amish-covid-vaccines-cancer-diabetes-autism-356029928165


67 posted on 04/23/2024 11:23:03 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
My only demand is that claims that the vaccines are dangerous be supported by facts rather than emotion.

Interestingly enough, that is exactly what I am trying to get you to do. Support your position that they are safe using facts.

68 posted on 04/23/2024 11:24:08 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

ShadowAce wrote: “Interestingly enough, that is exactly what I am trying to get you to do. Support your position that they are safe using facts.”

70.6% of the world population has received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.
13.57 billion doses have been administered globally, and 2,182 are now administered each day.

With over 13 billion doses administered, one can only conclude that the vaccines are safe.


69 posted on 04/23/2024 1:01:14 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Sorry, but number of doses administered has no relationship to safety of said doses.

And given the compressed time frame of those administrations, long-term effects are absolutely unknown.

70 posted on 04/23/2024 1:38:02 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

ShadowAce wrote: “Sorry, but number of doses administered has no relationship to safety of said doses. And given the compressed time frame of those administrations, long-term effects are absolutely unknown.”

The number of doses administered certainly does have a relationship to safety.

The vaccines have been administered over five years. That, and the number of doses, should indicate the relative safety of the vaccines.


71 posted on 04/23/2024 1:43:34 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Explain exactly how numbers of doses relates to safety.

And no assuming that the people who are administering them think they are safe.

Numbers of examples do not relate to safety in any way. The only way to be sure they are safe is to go through the testing process. Since these were rushed out in less than a year, there is no way that testing process was completed before they started handing them out.

72 posted on 04/23/2024 1:48:13 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

ShadowAce wrote: “Numbers of examples do not relate to safety in any way. The only way to be sure they are safe is to go through the testing process.”

Safety issues would have shown up after 14 billion doses.
All the tests were performed. Some were done in parallel which reduced the time required.


73 posted on 04/23/2024 4:21:15 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson