Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Renowned Scientist: All Covid-Vaxxed ‘Will Die in 3 to 5 Years’
SLAYNEWS ^ | 5/1/2024 | Frank Bergman

Posted on 05/01/2024 11:50:37 AM PDT by vespa300

A world-renowned scientist and leading immunology expert has raised the alarm with an explosive warning to the public that everyone who has been vaccinated with Covid mRNA shots “will die within 3 to 5 years, even if they have had only one injection.”

The alert was issued by Professor Dr. Dolores Cahill.

Prof. Cahill has over 25 years of expertise in high-throughput protein array, antibody array, proteomics technology development, and automation.

(Excerpt) Read more at slaynews.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: antifacthysteria; antivaxhysteria; batsinthebelfry; clickbait4qtards; clickbaitadspam; clickbucks; covid; dolorescahill; freepathonkiller; frindecline; frpfizershills; lolwhataloon; moonbattery; operationwarpspeed; pjdtvaxx; profaucihysteria; provaxhysteria; qtardnonsense; qvirus; thcparanoia; trumpvaccine; warpspeed; whatrusmoking; whyaintyoudeadyet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221 next last
To: Jamestown1630
It’s not gaining a function; it’s magnifying one that’s already there.

Then, the terminology is wrong.

The term then should be "enhancing of function' or 'enhancing a function'.

Gain of function sounds like adding a function, and gain a function sounds like adding a function too.

If a function is already there in a species, then, it's not changing the function, but enhancing the function, sort of like my analogy of a person enhancing something that's already there, like building up your muscles or body building.

Science can be precise, but then, when the terminology is not precise, it can be confusing, especially for the layman.

BTW, I was a physics major in college, so I know exactly what science is, and science has to be precise, otherwise, it's junk science.
201 posted on 05/01/2024 8:16:13 PM PDT by adorno (CCH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

That’s a fair point, and I’m very sorry you and others had that experience.

However, my puzzlement over the way people reacted to Covid was not directed at the 3-5 percent who got really ill from it - I was talking about the 96-97% who experienced cold like symptoms and yet allowed their lives to be turned upside down.

I got are really sick, then of course, take the necessary precautions and treatments.

In my opinion, the whole world went mad and brainlessly complied with draconian one-size-fits-all measures that were completely inappropriate for the vast majority of people.

No different than forcing everybody to use the wrong pronouns to appease some tiny fraction of the population suffering from gender dysphoria.

Or forcing flood regions to ration water because people in Southern California are worried about it.


202 posted on 05/01/2024 11:08:22 PM PDT by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Maybe! :)


203 posted on 05/02/2024 5:32:43 AM PDT by wintertime ( Behind every government school teacher stand armed police.( Real bullets in those guns on the hip!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: adorno

I think ‘gain’ is used more in the sense it is used in electronics, not in the sense of ‘acquiring.’


204 posted on 05/02/2024 9:59:57 AM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630
I think ‘gain’ is used more in the sense it is used in electronics, not in the sense of ‘acquiring.’

What does 'gain' mean in electronics? And what does 'acquiring' mean in biology or in any other field?
205 posted on 05/02/2024 10:22:40 AM PDT by adorno (CCH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: adorno

Gain = amplification.

Acquire means to attain - or, yes, gain. But it isn’t meant that way in this context.

From Wiki:

“Gain-of-function research (GoF research or GoFR) is medical research that genetically alters an organism in a way that may enhance the biological functions of gene products.”


206 posted on 05/02/2024 10:32:13 AM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: enumerated
In retrospect, it is obvious that our government went way too far, as did many governments throughout the world.

But some of this overreaction was triggered by the information coming out of China. We now know that China was deliberately hyping how deadly this virus was in order to justify themselves in clearing the streets of Hong Kong of protestors.

We were constantly seeing videos from China of people falling down in the street. Images of body-bags everywhere laying on the ground and stacked in ambulances up to the ceiling.

China was spraying down the streets with disinfectant, people were wearing disposable booties on their feet to prevent tracking the virus into their homes on their shoes.

You may not have seen these videos or heard this news, but what *I* saw was frightening.

I now believe it was all deliberately fabricated to trigger a panic and to allow them to take total control of the streets of Hong Kong. (Where massive protests had been going on daily for over a year, and thereby humiliating the Chinese communist leadership.)

China faked us out, and many of our officials fell for it just as I did at the time.

207 posted on 05/02/2024 10:46:47 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

China may have taken political advantage of this; but I’ve wondered if they themselves weren’t exactly sure of what they had on their hands.


208 posted on 05/02/2024 10:51:10 AM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630

Genetic enhancement in that sense, sounds like ‘componentially’ changing the way an organism works, Changing an organism in that fashion, would essentially make them a different organism. Enhancement means making a species’ components to work better, but with the same components in place, sort of like a human does by doing body-building.

Yet, the Covid virus, or the corona virus, is still essentially the same virus, and the gain of function virus in question, is still the same virus with enhanced features that it came with. Bigger, better, faster, does not mean a different organism has been created. Covid-19 had/has variations since it came to infect people in 2019, but, those variations did not result in a different species. Does gain of function result in a different species, or are we talking about ‘gain a function’, which would mean just an enhanced virus with the same components?


209 posted on 05/02/2024 10:53:43 AM PDT by adorno (CCH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: adorno

I never suggested that a ‘different’ organism - much less a different species! - had been ‘created’. And yes - the term ‘gain of function’ indicates an enhancement of what is already there; it doesn’t indicate ‘gaining A function’, which you suggest say presents ‘no difference’ in meaning.

You know what? I think you should find the person who named this type of research and tell him/her that they were very mistaken in their choice of terms. I’m sure that will be a much more satisfying argument for you.


210 posted on 05/02/2024 11:02:33 AM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630

A human being can gain a function that he/she did not have before. Body building can make a person a lot stronger than before. That’s gaining a function. A virus that is enhanced is gaining a function, with the same properties it already possesses. So, why should it be called ‘gain OF function’ when it’s just enhancing a property that already exists in the organism?


211 posted on 05/02/2024 11:09:02 AM PDT by adorno (CCH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: adorno

No, body building involves enhancing a function that is already there - the ‘stuff’ required to do it is there; so it’s a gain (or increase) OF function.

I’m tired of this now. Find someone else to convince that the term is a misnomer.


212 posted on 05/02/2024 11:14:05 AM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630
I’m tired of this now. Find someone else to convince that the term is a misnomer.

Not a misnomer. Just the same terminology for the same thing. Gain of function is the same as gain a function. You started the argument with trying to correct me on the terminology, so, it's good that you're giving up. Ta-ta!
213 posted on 05/02/2024 11:23:14 AM PDT by adorno (CCH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: adorno

What I told you happens to be exactly what this type of research is called. So your argument is with those who named it.


214 posted on 05/02/2024 11:25:01 AM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630
So your argument is with those who named it.

You made it OUR argument when you decided to challenge me on the terminology. You took umbrage with my challenge to the terminology. You were and are defending the terminology, so, it's YOUR terminology too, which is still wrong.
215 posted on 05/02/2024 11:30:57 AM PDT by adorno (CCH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

“China faked us out, and many of our officials fell for it just as I did at the time.”

Some of our officials fell for it - others knew it was fabricated but saw it as a great strategy to emulate here against MAGA. The proof is that BLM rioters and illegal border crossers were never forced to wear masks or get vaccinated.

I think that stark double standard was a dead giveaway and the reason I knew it was fake from the beginning. I remember early on when the test kits first became available - Elon Musk tweeting that he took four tests n one day, two of them negative and two of them positive.

There were other ways the fakeness of Covid was exposed.
Some doctor (I forget his name) made an interesting point: Unlike a piss test for pregnancy, there was no way to verify a Covid positive.

No woman has EVER relied on the home pregnancy test - a positive result triggers a doctor visit - and there all sorts of exacting ways to confirm the pregnancy up to and including the fact that a baby eventually comes out.

Not so with Covid. There’s no proof anyone actually had Covid - just those mysterious tests - fake tests created by the same Big Pharma that peddled the fake vaccines.


216 posted on 05/02/2024 12:26:38 PM PDT by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630
China may have taken political advantage of this; but I’ve wondered if they themselves weren’t exactly sure of what they had on their hands.

I think they released it on purpose. The people of Hong Kong were mocking them for over a year, and they dared not send in the army for fear of driving away investment and business, so they fumed and fumed until I think they hit upon the idea of creating a public health crisis that would allow them to send in the army under cover of a "medical emergency."

And it worked. They got the millions of protestors off the streets and have now successfully suppressed that Hong Kong independence from the Chinese leadership nonsense.

As a bonus, it helped them get rid of Trump, who was putting the hurt on them with his trade policy.

I think Georgia was swung by Chinese money going to the governor and the Secretary of state.

217 posted on 05/02/2024 3:11:02 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

I don’t know. It may have been a ‘useful’ accident at the time.


218 posted on 05/02/2024 3:34:51 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

No they are not. Hmmmm.


219 posted on 05/02/2024 3:36:34 PM PDT by wgmalabama (Censored!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630

May have been, but they had the motive, and they benefitted greatly from it.


220 posted on 05/02/2024 4:39:15 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson