sane legislation from Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee if i know my biblical history i believe that is either the 3rd or 4th sign of the apocalypse
To: Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; BlackbirdSST; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
To: freepatriot32
This is silly. They should create a new set of task forces, and have them run around the country arresting the first set of task forces and sending them to jail.
Maybe we could even have gunfights and car crashes.....
To: freepatriot32
It really bothers me that I agree with her and the rest of the knuckleheads on this...
"I sense a disturbance in The Force"
4 posted on
06/04/2005 12:46:21 PM PDT by
motzman
(now whatda?)
To: freepatriot32
As I look at the group sponsoring this bill I seem to see a lot of folks from States and Districts that have a BIIIIIG Drug problem. The ACLU, NAACP, Black Police Association , La Raza. The same folks who's constituents have a large p[opulation of folks in jail for drug dealing. It looks kind of like a bill to keep drug dealers out of jail. Now I am not in favor of innocent people being railroaded into jail by false testimony but I also feel maybe they are throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
To: All
7 posted on
06/04/2005 12:50:36 PM PDT by
Cindy
To: freepatriot32
I wonder who paid SJL for this? Because there are not a lot of votes to be had from "wrongly convicted: drug dealers.
Don't let the SJL you see on TV fool you. Like most people in Congress SJL is basically on ebay when it comes to what she does in Washington. When it comes to $$$ she's neither liberal or conservative. She's just available to the highest bidder.
8 posted on
06/04/2005 12:50:56 PM PDT by
isthisnickcool
(Get all the incumbents out of politics!)
To: freepatriot32
I agreed until I got to the part about basically saying if the only evidence is testimony of a law enforcement officer, there should be no case. That bothers me. If law enforcement officers are committing perjury, prosecute them. But to say we won't consider testimony of an honorable officer to be compelling evidence bothers me.
Besides, if the problem is crooked cops, what makes anyone think they won't plant evidence and/or have multiple crooked cops substantiate false accusations?
13 posted on
06/04/2005 1:46:07 PM PDT by
sharktrager
(The masses will trade liberty for a more quiet life.)
To: freepatriot32
I am plumb stunned, shocked and amazed... Something that makes sense. One small step on the way to reining in the thugs!
22 posted on
06/04/2005 8:38:15 PM PDT by
dcwusmc
("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
To: freepatriot32
Rangel's welcoming of Castro to New York recently was probably a reflection of Rangel's urges to decriminalize criminals, to welcome in the new realm of drugs fer all!
I wouldn't be surprised, is all I'm saying, given the news in this article and Rangel's display of eager affections at seeing Castro on American soil.
24 posted on
06/05/2005 12:39:09 AM PDT by
BIRDS
To: freepatriot32
It'll never pass, too many LEO's depend on that money to operate. Watch for opposition from the Faternal Order Of Police, among other groups.
26 posted on
06/05/2005 3:30:05 AM PDT by
CrawDaddyCA
(There is no such thing as a fair fight. Thou shall win at all costs!!)
To: freepatriot32
"After dozens of people were falsely imprisoned for several years in Texas because of false allegations"The majority confessed. Those that didn't were tried in a court of law and found guilty by a jury of their peers.
No one, repeat, no one, was imprisoned due to false allegations.
To: freepatriot32
Wel l by sheila( I can't e anyore stupid) Lee I guess all cops whould e denined witness status at trials. She has to be done of the dumest humans on eart,
29 posted on
06/14/2005 9:01:11 PM PDT by
marty60
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson