[vikzilla]

But to say we won't consider testimony of an honorable officer to be compelling evidence bothers me.

I would tend to agree with you except for far to long the honorable officers have kept their mouths shut about the dishonorable officers.

You see it was more important for them to stand by their buddy and protect their career, than to stand by the constitution and rules against unreasonable search and seizure

Seems to be to be more of a case of the chickens coming home to roost.

[sharktrager]

But, her argument reminds me of people who insist all murder cases should have eye witnesses and/or DNA. Problem is, that just isn't realistic.