Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: GOP_Party_Animal

There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that 1) had the atomic bombs somehow malfunctioned, or 2) Truman somehow had the misguided balls to stop a two billion dollar project dead in its tracks without using the weapons --- we would had to have invaded Japan at the cost of hundreds of thousands of US lives, and most likely -- through more B-29 incendiary and carpet bombing, starvation because of the naval blockade, and suicidal resistance to our amphibious landings --- millions of Japanese.

In addition, Marshall was planning on using atomic bombs as tactical weapons on beachheads and troop concentrations, in the event of invasion.

Talk about unimaginable....that is exactly why Hirohito and the "peace" faction in the Japanese were finally able to overcome the fanatical resistance of the military...the military had nothing to offer the Japanese people but genocidal and cultural extinction.


100 posted on 10/29/2005 9:37:32 PM PDT by Basilides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: Basilides
Don't argue whether it was right or wrong. You have to remember, Japan also had a nuclear weapons program! They also developed a submarine that could launch an aircraft explicitly so they could attack American cities with nukes! The Germans were cooperating and sending yellowcake on submarines to Japan to help them.

The question you have to ask is: if Japan had a nuclear weapon, would they have used it on us?

I think the answer is obvious. It was like a gunfight, but we were faster at the draw.
105 posted on 10/29/2005 9:42:28 PM PDT by burzum (Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.-Adm H Rickover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson