"If you can explain the processes of life in terms of empirical data, what do you need the supernatural for? "
But that could only be accomplished to a certain extent, wouldn't it.
Even if scientists could prove, without a doubt, that all life evolved from a chemical reaction, wouldn't that still leave the question of how the chemicals came to be in the first place?
I don't see any incompatiblity with evolution and natural selection, and religion. But the 'big bang' question still remains because it leaves the question of what happened before that occurred and what made it occur to begin with.
JMHO
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
The business of organized religion since I was in college and began to think the whole thing through didn't make much sense..no empirical data for sure...and the story...WOW..and to think it was told at the time nearly 2000 years ago...when they were burning folks at the stake for being witches and such 1500 years later...leaves a lot of questions. I have worked out to my satisfaction answers to most of the thoughts...with one major exception...cruising along at night 8 miles from the earths surface and above most of the earths atmosphere and then looking out of the cockpit window and musing...where does it end and if it does what's on the other side. Now that has me puzzled!! Big Bang is a possibility...of course then who provided the spark for the big bang? I get so "cornfused" at times.