Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Republic Purge: Conservative Web Site Bans Giuliani Supporters
NY Observer ^ | Published: May 24, 2007 | by Rebecca Sinderbrand

Posted on 05/26/2007 1:49:34 PM PDT by Eurotwit

A few weeks ago – in between Hillary Clinton’s official entry into the presidential race and the first Republican primary debate of the cycle – the fiery online conservative forum Free Republic marked a decade in operation as one of the premier online forums for right-wing political discussion.

It also experienced one of the biggest internal battles to rock the site since the 2000 election of George W. Bush -- a tumultuous campaign year that nearly tore the site apart, as its founder and chief administrator first cleansed commenting ranks of Bush supporters, then, later, rallied to his support.

At the heart of the latest controversy: the fight over the conservative bona fides of Rudy Giuliani.

Over the past few weeks, chaos has reigned in the “Freeper” community as members sympathetic to the former mayor's candidacy claim to have suffered banishment from the site. They were victimized, they say, by a wave of purges designed to weed out any remaining support for the Giuliani campaign on the popular conservative web forum. Another significant chunk of commenters have migrated away from the controversial site over the action, according to a number of former site members and conservative bloggers who have been tracking the situation.

In a plaintive post on the blog “Sweetness & Light,” exiled commenter Steve Gilbert, who says he does not support the former mayor’s campaign, blasted the site’s new “anti-Giuliani, anti-abortion jihad.” Since George W. Bush was elected president, he wrote, “there haven’t been any large scale [Free Republic] purges to speak of – until now.”

The fight began one month ago, when site founder Jim Robinson posted an anti-Giuliani manifesto titled: “Giuliani as the GOP presidential nominee would be a dagger in the heart of the conservative movement.” Then the virtual ax started to swing. Longtime posters to the freewheeling discussion threads, used to serious no-holds-barred web etiquette, were still stunned by the intensity of the anti-Rudy activity; conservative blogs buzzed with the development.

“Jim Robinson has been going on a tear demonizing Rudy Giuliani, because Rudy (agreeing with the vast majority of Americans), is personally opposed to abortions on a moral level…” complained a user on the GOPUSA Web site. “Anyone who posts any support for Giuliani at the site, if it's at all forceful, will be banned.”

(“Normally, we don't allow complaints about other conservative forums,” chided the moderator, but “…because it is being discussed all over the Internet, I'll make an exception.”)

Just a few months ago, Rudy Giuliani placed second in an early Free Republic straw poll; now, his support on the site has been virtually eliminated. “After the ‘April Purge,’ I don't think there are any Rudybots left around here,” noted Free Republic commenter “upchuck” in one recent post. “And if there are, they're not posting pro-Rudy stuff :).”

The forums weren’t the only venue for the Free Republic’s new antagonism toward Mr. Giuliani, which coincided with a wave of comments expressing similar sentiments from other corners of the conservative movement. A few days after Mr. Giuliani’s equivocal Roe v. Wade comments at the Republican presidential debate on May 3, a new “STOP RUDY NOW News & Information Thread” was featured on the site, and a newly-created stand-alone category debuted via a link from the homepage: “The Giuliani Truth File.” (So far this campaign season, Mr. Giuliani is the only candidate – Republican or Democratic – to be singled out for that level of scrutiny from the Free Republic.)

Why Rudy? Why now? Some conservative bloggers and former commenters contacted for their view of the continuing controversy say they believe that site founder Jim Robinson holds ideologically middling Republicans like Mr. Giuliani responsible for the GOP’s congressional loss and current woes. (They asked that their names be kept out of this story for fear of antagonizing the famously frisky site regulars.)

Others claim that the former mayor’s top-tier status is spurring frantic site administrators into action. Finally, one popular theory holds that the Free Republic is secretly hoping for another Clinton presidency that would send its Alexa ratings soaring back to levels it hasn’t experienced since its halcyon days of the Clinton impeachment, when a since-soured relationship with blog pioneer Matt Drudge and overwhelming anti-Clinton sentiment in Republican ranks helped make Free Republic one of the hottest Web sites in the nation. It hasn't recovered that luster since the Bush administration took over.

“It’s not a conspiracy theory, it’s an observation,” said one blogger, who describes himself as a half-hearted Mitt Romney supporter. “They’ve still got a brand name that means something, but they’re not what they were in terms of real-world impact. A Hillary presidency would get them there.”

Robinson himself could not be reached for comment, but his original post laid out his case against Mr. Giuliani – a graphics-heavy presentation of some of the former mayor’s most damning moderate quotes in mainstream media venues, along with a color-coded report card tracking his less-than-doctrinaire positions on abortion, immigration, gays and guns.

Robinson, it should be noted, famously blasted George W. Bush’s presidential candidacy back in 2000, before a dramatic late-campaign about-face that saw him emerge as one of the GOP ticket’s biggest supporters. But whether or not Free Republic experiences a similar election-year shift this cycle, the site’s current campaign is spreading a dangerous primary-season meme of Rudy Giuliani as big-city liberal – and turning one of the most influential web forums in conservatism into an exclusive gathering place for those who share that view.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bugzapper; byebyerinos; freepicide; goodriddance; popcorntime; rinowhine; springcleaning; wambulance; whiners
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,421-1,422 next last
To: supremedoctrine
” I’m still searching for a candidate, or at least a Republican ticket with ONE good candidate on it, top OR bottom.”

I like what I see in Duncan Hunter and Fred Thompson. Either or both of those would be great.

Rooty doesn’t have a single issue that he claims to be strong on that can’t be debunked with the FACTS!

661 posted on 05/27/2007 5:01:54 PM PDT by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super Walmart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 610 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot
Peach was spewing bile for months before she got zotted.

Yeah??? Well, bile is in the eye of the beholder, IMO.

Do you support her posting lies about Reagan to prop up Rudy?

662 posted on 05/27/2007 5:02:57 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 654 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

However, her departure was very shortly after Jim found out about it.


663 posted on 05/27/2007 5:04:40 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I’m just glad it’s over. I don’t have the stomach for the dirty jobs like that. I don’t think I’d be a very good soldier either, but I’m sure grateful to those who are.


664 posted on 05/27/2007 5:05:45 PM PDT by LilAngel (No blood for ingrates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot; Jim Robinson
Whether you want to admit it or not, they were much more mainstream in all aspects than the kooky fringe in here.

I really don't appreciate a puppet of the outcasts calling us kooky.

665 posted on 05/27/2007 5:06:09 PM PDT by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

As someone posted recently, Howlin’s was probably the most ill advised comment in the history of FR.


666 posted on 05/27/2007 5:06:24 PM PDT by b9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies]

To: bjs1779

666


667 posted on 05/27/2007 5:06:39 PM PDT by don-o (We are "THEY")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 665 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"So, you think that diplomatic immunity is a municipal choice?"

Do you remember what we’ve discussed so far? Look again at post posts #569 and #573, and then explain to me how I’m telling you that diplomatic immunity is a municipal function. You’ve been alternating between playing coy with me, feeling out what I know of the specifics, and dramatic riotous indignation about something you seem to know but won’t explain. Now you try to accuse me of some addressing something that I already told you I’m not aware of? Are you drunk? Go play games with someone who has time for that crap.

668 posted on 05/27/2007 5:06:49 PM PDT by elfman2 (An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 644 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot; LilAngel; Jim Robinson
Like most posters, they responded in the manner in which people post to them.

Whether you want to admit it or not, they were much more mainstream in all aspects than the kooky fringe in here.

Funny, I always thought that Free Republic was a CONSERVATIVE forum and not a "mainstream" chat room. As Ronald Reagan proved, when conservative principles are demonstrated to be effective, the mainstream embraces them.

669 posted on 05/27/2007 5:12:02 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
Now you try to accuse me of some addressing something that I already told you I’m not aware of?

And you accuse ME of being drunk?

670 posted on 05/27/2007 5:13:58 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

She sure hit all the leftist talking points, didn’t she?


671 posted on 05/27/2007 5:14:06 PM PDT by darkangel82 (Socialism is NOT an American value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot; 8mmMauser; T'wit; BykrBayb; bjs1779; floriduh voter; wagglebee
Checking in from the kooky fringe here, you know, the crazies who are against murdering innocents, that type of thing.

Just saw this and my mind boggled! DCPatriot,where have you been? Haven't you followed any of the Terri threads these recent years? We were pestered, ridiculed, cursed, and laughed at by that band of bothers. Yes, that includes Peach who was a part of that salty gang. They were supported by new trolls and by ClownPosse which featured special ridicule of all related to Terri.

Why should any of us show you the links? That is a word trap often used by the departed band to put us on the defensive. You have been here a long time. You know how to search. Search the Terri Dailies and you will find most all, not all because the tag team did succeed in pushing some threads right off the map.

And they sounded then like you do now.

I wasn't down on that gaggle of irritants because of Rudy, but because of their assault on true conservative values, something you do not appear to understand.

672 posted on 05/27/2007 5:14:43 PM PDT by 8mmMauser (Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 589 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

That’s because she’s a leftist.


673 posted on 05/27/2007 5:15:08 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot

Thanks for clearing that up. I’ll try to give you some leeway in the future, for your speaking style, and not be so quick to take things personally.


674 posted on 05/27/2007 5:15:26 PM PDT by LilAngel (No blood for ingrates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

I read Lucianne just to see if there is something posted there that I haven’t found on FR yet...same with NRO. Just tryin’ to keep up.


675 posted on 05/27/2007 5:17:26 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Thanks congress and President Bush, I'm feeling very non-multi-culti today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

She’s one of the original Fred Thompson supporters. Hardly leftist, that.


676 posted on 05/27/2007 5:20:43 PM PDT by b9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

To: OwenKellogg

Okay then refund their membership dues! Ha! Ha!


677 posted on 05/27/2007 5:22:42 PM PDT by dvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: b9

Well, she’s over at the anti-FReeper site she helps run supporting Roody.


678 posted on 05/27/2007 5:24:28 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies]

To: bray
Twice you've said "Peach's son is fighting in Iraq"

First I heard of this...

Where did she get this son?....just curious?

679 posted on 05/27/2007 5:25:04 PM PDT by Guenevere (Duncan Hunter for President, 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

Yep. Thompson or Hunter are way more likely to be bottom half on the ticket. Thompson , of the two, seems the only one remotely possible to be a grassroots johnnycomelately comeonanddraftme type of candidate, but he had better get on the stick soon and “announce” in some way if he is to be taken seriously-—and bear in mind that the longer he waits, the more ALL the existing Republican candidates will sneer at him as an overconfident dilettante. McCain also seems already a lost cause as the Pres candidate of choice, and the others, (though I do like Huckabee) look like also-rans. Sam Brownback came off worst of all in that debate a few weeks ago, but at least like more of a Republican that Ron Liberalitarian Paul. I see ONLY either Romney or Rudy as the choice, sanctioned by the Party Organization, and you’d better admit that THAT is what decides a nominee, and we could work all day and all night from now to November, for our favorite candidates and it wouldn’t amount to anything over what is now in the process of being decided by the RNC. Sorry to have come to that conclusion, but events of the last 20 years have PROVED it.
And better pay attention to me: I picked the AMerican Idol winner TWO years in a row,the only two years I’ve watched and BOTH of them I picked when there were 24 competitors to choose from.


680 posted on 05/27/2007 5:25:07 PM PDT by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 661 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,421-1,422 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson