BP2 showed how the “Punk’d” version of this one doesn’t match what was actually posted so the story of the “punking” doesn’t hold water. There are 3 or 4 anomalies - the most obvious one being the brown spot on the mother’s portion and a misspelled word associated with that.
There’s another thread where Ender Wiggins and his bud are claiming they did the “punking” - but the last time I checked there, nobody had even addressed BP2’s forensic evidence that the “Punk’d” image doesn’t even match the image Taitz has. Pretty shoddy work to claim you posted a hoax when what you have as your “proof” doesn’t even match what was posted.
These people are into big-time disinformation. They’re running scared. That’s what’s going on in Hawaii too. They’re running scared. And the cover-up only draws attention to that fact.
I remember the document with the smudge over "maiden", I am trying to organize a theory of mine around the forgery techniques being used by the obot interns and comparing to current attempts, of course I cannot for obvious reason post my findings, I am literally tossing leaves in the air here.The Punkster actually did respond to BP2 with this:
“The Punk’d photos were taken months after the original photo was taken. In fact, the original photo was taken months before it ever became public. The “stain” wasn’t a stain, but rather a piece of tobacco I’d used to cover up the typo in “Maiden.” It fell off shortly after the original photo was taken.
The crease was in the original photo, though not as pronounced as in the Punk’d photo because the lighting was more direct in the original. You can see it in the original if you use the high res version as opposed to the crappy compressed JPG’s that were released by others.
As for the dimple and fold, again, it was months after the original photo and the document had been handled, unfolded and re-folded a number of times.”
It seems plausible but we have no way of knowing if it is BS or the truth.