Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: chicken head; Seizethecarp; WhizCodger; LucyT; American Constitutionalist

It’s very difficult to get the Courts to consider something like this. Then there’s the problem of figuring out just which is the proper venue for such a case and what type of litigation can even be pursued. I have tried to work with Orly Taitz in the past as well as other attorneys. I am currently composing new litigation which should be filed in the US District Court in the District of Columbia. It wont be a Quo Warranto though.


38 posted on 03/05/2010 8:51:13 PM PST by InspectorSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: InspectorSmith

Fraud/Treason basic would be my suggestion.


40 posted on 03/05/2010 8:57:07 PM PST by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: InspectorSmith

This is really off the wall. I’m just brainstorming so I haven’t thought this through.

What if somebody accused you of forgery? Wouldn’t you then have the right to access any documentation necessary to defend yourself?

Maybe we should be working with Ender Wiggins and his sidekick to get them to report you to law enforcement. Or maybe we could report you to law enforcement for forgery and perjury (the very things Obama is guilty of) so you could defend yourself.

Of course, it wouldn’t be very comfortable for you. I suggested to my husband that we should not pay our taxes so that we would get charged with tax evasion and could defend ourselves by proving that there is no tax law signed by a valid president. It would mean the end of my husband’s career though and he was not too keen on it. So I can well imagine you wouldn’t be keen on it either. Especially as Obama’s minions get more time to manufacture documents. By signing the affidavit you practically dared Obama to charge you with perjury, though. He won’t. He never will, because that would lead to discovery. But maybe somebody else could. Maybe we could find a law enforcement person who would be willing to bring this all to a head.

Again, I’m just thinking out loud. I honestly think that at this point the criminal justice system is the only place that can be forced to say a person has “standing” - but only if somebody is actually accused of something.

I don’t know. Any thoughts?


43 posted on 03/05/2010 9:01:21 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: InspectorSmith

I have wondered lately about the Senate pushing a partisan Health Care Program thru with 51 votes, and the Republicans are impotent to stop it, right? What would happen if they all banded together and demanded that Obama prove he meets the qualifications to be POTUS? I believe that they can do that, right? At the very least it would stop the Health Care push dead in its tracks, and just might kill two birds with one stone.

Keep digging Lucas Smith...


44 posted on 03/05/2010 9:01:38 PM PST by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: InspectorSmith

i do know that if 2 witnesses claim that the BC is real in court, it could be used under our treason law.. mabe you should file this under treason with 2 witnesses— (read section 3 )

http://topics.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleiii


45 posted on 03/05/2010 9:03:12 PM PST by chicken head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: InspectorSmith; chicken head
My (non-lawyer) understanding:

Under the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) certified BC's issued by US states, such as the HI COLB, are considered to be "self-authenticating" in federal court unless challenged. The HI COLB would be granted a hearsay exception and wouldn't require authentication by HI authorities to be entered into evidence in court.

However the FRE requires that certified foreign documents, such as InspectorSmith's CPGH BC, must be authenticated by the authorities of that country if they are to be entered into evidence.

Given the extremely corrupt and dangerous political environment in Kenya where authentication or non-authentication would likely go to the highest bidder, Obama's team would likely easily obtain a rejection of InspectorSmith's CPGH BC as a "fake". Also, a man claiming to be Obama's tribal cousin, Raila Odinga, is Prime Minister of Kenya who is doubtless aware that a Kenya birth for Obama would make him ineligible to be POTUS.

Note that the top national police officer of Kenya was fired and his deputy was demoted four days after Lucas Smith (InspectorSmith) filed his affidavit in Judge Carter's court in CA revealing that he had paid off a guard, most likely a national police officer, to look the other way while he obtained the CPGH BC.

57 posted on 03/05/2010 9:21:04 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson