I’m sure there’s professional agitators here. I just wish management was more aggressive in showing them the door. If you want to support one candidate over the other, great, but when the lies start to fly and the ugliness, that’s when ZOTs need to be used.
One argument the Cruz side makes is that their guy will be less damaged and less polarizing for November, but let’s face it, if Jesus Christ were the GOP nominee, the media elites, the party establishment and the decadent cultural leaders would paint him as the next Hitler (case in point, the article that is the subject of this thread). There’s no Republican heading into the fall that won’t have 40-45% of the electorate against them, so they will all be “damaged” and “polarizing.”
Sadly, such is the nature of the game these days. It should be the other party that ought to have 90%+ of the electorate permanently aligned against them.
The professionals are savvy in the ways of hiding what they are. There have been a few prominent busts, but there are a few USUAL SUSPECTS still out there.
And that's all it takes to disrupt the board. Actually, people think that the Cruz/Trump furor is what it's all about - when in actuality it's about reducing the effectiveness of the board against Her Thighness & The Bern.
Wheels within wheels. I've been here a VERY long time. :)