“Want a list of police officers who have been convicted of sex crimesÇ
INTERESTING. Why don’t you defend them against the corrupt me and prosecutors that sent them to jail?
You can’t have it both ways.
The corrupt you? Was that a confession, a Freudian slip?
AND
Defend WHO? Defend the police officers that are accused, and sometimes found guilty of sex crimes? For those, there are some NAMES. In regards to those whom Waco PD seized cellphones from after the Twin Peaks incident we have no names. Not yet. Just as a few LEO's being guilty of some foul crime, or crimes does not serve to make all LEO's equally guilty of those same crimes, not all the "bikers" are as equally guilty for what was found on one (or two?) cellphones. Can you get that much through your head? That much was spelled out for you when this information first came to light more than a year ago. Obviously, you're just trolling the forum, but are now getting tangled up your own posturing/posing bullshitting.
For the second time on this thread (maybe you'll get it this time, but i doubt it!) when those names come to light, and the evidence examined by a jury, if it's anything like Waco PD "whoopsie" released data for, and a biker or two is found guilty, I seriously doubt any here would defend them. I know I would not -- much like you, yourself do not defend police officers when they do much of the same type of thing.
Do you have anything to say that's not sick "projection"? It's yourself who has long been trying to have things both ways.
Speaking of which -- IF there are among the 154 defendants an individual, or individuals who were guilty of crime of possessing "child-porn" -- why have those not been charged for that crime and brought to trial?
Did the DA's Office allow child 'molesters' to walk free in exchange for them giving info that would help the DA's Office win convictions against yet other persons?