They weren’t arrested for existing as black people, but for trespassing in breach of a reasonable policy. Sheesh! Ridiculous idiots. Except that it’s all racist, leftist agitprop identity politics.
They weren’t arrested for existing as black people, but for trespassing in breach of a reasonable policy. Sheesh! Ridiculous idiots. Except that it’s all racist, leftist agitprop identity politics.”
Exactly. Race hustlers are promoting the new narrative that they were arrested for being black in Starbucks. Sadly even a local conservative talk show host started his show with that premise.
Can anyone address the time period involved with the black guys in the Starbucks? Were they there 15 minutes prior to being asked to leave, an hour, half a day? I believe that makes a difference as to whether they were loitering illegally or just behaving as a normal customer.
I have searched in vain through all the msm articles I can find, but nowhere is the time stated. It is obviously known to the police, to the Starbucks and probably to the msm, but no one seems to want to publish.
It will either help or hurt with the accusations of racism and I think deserves to be published.
If a manager had told a white person to leave, and that white person would not leave, and then the police told the white person to leave, and he argued and refused to leave, he would be arrested too. That is how it works. I swear, this was a set-up.