They are correct.
Rabin
How is it possible that msm gets crazier every week?
I caught that. The hooker asked that as if it would be a bad thing and as a "gotcha" question.
Trouble is, the DOJ works for the Executive branch and the President is the "head" of the executive branch. The DOJ investigating Federal crimes at the behest of the Executive is exactly how it's supposed to work.
Let's not let the derps redefine the Constitution. Let's stop buying into their false premises and narratives.
Kamaltoe was playing into people's ignorance. Because she is ignorant.
Saw the headline and thought this was gonna be a story about Willie Brown’s lap.
NASTINESS was on full display yesterday.....Democrats are VILE, EVIL, VICIOUS DESTROYERS of good people.
And Willie Brown stuck her
The Emerson Collective owns a majority state in this rag, and is looking to go for full ownership.
The Emerson Collective.
Nuff said.
Barr did absolutely excellent. All the democrats were there for was to angrily tarnish his reputation because they have to save face. Nadler won’t be able to interrogate Barr after a committee hearing that absolutely went off the rails to push through the resolution to add lawyers to the people basically kangaroo-courting Barr.
Barr’s one hell of a guy to put up with all of this sh-t.
What difference does his summery make now that the report is out. He didn’t need to release it at all. The Mule Team were a bunch of Hillary hacks carrying out the coup.
I’m not sure if was Kamala Harris, but I recall one of the senators asking Barr about how President Trump could possibly have thought Mueller had a conflict of interest that would justify Mueller being replaced by a new Special Prosecutor. The Attorney General did not answer that question and the discussion moved on to other topics. It would have really helped the President if Barr had outlined possible reasons that Mueller might plausibly be considered conflicted: he was a long-time personal friend of Comey, whose firing was the trigger for the Special Counsel’s appointment; he had been FBI director for 12 years and might not be able to objectively deal with evidence that cast discredit on an institution he personally must care about very much; and finally, that he had been seeking the job of Comey’s replacement as head of the FBI, had been interviewed by Trump, and not immediately hired (which might engender animus in a lot of people against the person who had rejected them, a potential animus that might amount to a conflict of interest). The stated reason for appointing a Special Prosecutor was that the FBI and Justice Department could not properly investigate matters that involved allegations of improper behavior by Justice Department officials. If that was the case, then what was needed was an OUTSIDE investigator, someone who had no personal interest in how things turned out. Very arguably, Mueller was not enough of an outsider to properly fulfill his role.
I believe that President Trump raised these issues because he was concerned that a mistake had been made in appointing such an interested party. If his concerns had resulted in the Special Counsel being replaced, it would have only prolonged Trump’s time under a cloud. By raising the issue and pressing it, the President was acting against his own benefit, but his actions are being interpreted by his enemies in the worst light. The claim seems to be that Trump would benefit if Mueller lost his job. I guess the assumption is that getting rid of Mueller would stop the investigation, which would NOT have happened.