The solar cycle climate model is 93% accurate at predicting present-day climate based on historical climate data.
No climate “scientist’s” computer model comes close to that degree of accuracy and never will because of the impossibility of knowing and mapping an infinite number of initial conditions at a precise moment in time.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/09/04/chaos-climate-part-3-chaos-models/
The only reason climate “scientists” don’t use the solar cycle climate model is because it doesn’t give them the result they want; global warming (which is code for a license to exterminate 90% of the global population).
Suppose there are 30 decimal points between Point AA and point AD. I will develop 30 models. At least one of them is bound to be “right”. I can boast that my model was accurate in its prediction. Is it any different than a batter who hits a home run..and strikes out 29 out of 30 times.
The only difference is the boasting rights of the climate game are not the same as baseball.
“Science” these days is choosing a narrative and then cherry-picking data to support it.
That is exactly how the witch-doctors did it for centuries!
Looks like prof Z’s link has been taken down. She was excellent, hope it is still out there somewhere.