They are apples and oranges. Male circumcision removes foreskin. Female circumcision removes the whole organ or mutilates it to the point that it no longer functions. You can't even equate the two.
I'll agree that the two are very different, but it still doesn't get rid of the fact that we're subjecting male babies in the U.S. of A. to undergo penile surgery literally hours or days after their birth FOR NO GOOD REASON.
"Oh, they can't feel it. Oh, it's a cleanliness issue."
What I find the most odd about it is the implication that GOD somehow screwed up when designing the male penis. Everything else on the body seems to have been 'created' just fine, but those penises... God must have screwed up, so we gotta run in there with knives to cut away at male baby penises. It's twisted.
BTW, I'm not religious in the least, but I'll firmly say that I think the male penis has 'evolved' or was 'created' just fine, thank you very much.
I HATE this subject, because it is "Personal, & 'Painful'"!
ONE MORE TIME, I will attempt to educate the "FR Circumcision Buffs!"
What I NOW tell you is the ABSOLUTE TRUTH---Un-Tainted by ANY "socio-political agenda!"
-------The Removal of the Male Foreskin DIRECTLY REDUCES the "Male's" ability to receive Sexual Stimulation, & Substantially reduces the "Male's" ability to appreciate Sexual stimulation to the head of his Penis!!
THERE, --I've Said it!!--!
Male circumcision has a DELETERIOUS EFFECT on male sexual pleasure!!
FIRE AWAY!!
As an "Un-Circumcised Male," I can ABSOLUTELY DEFEND the above postulations!
Doc