To: Mr. Bird
"It's an academic exercise only. Regardless of whether the states had rights to secession (which can only be implied), the "Union" went to war to prevent it. So, you can say the North was wrong, but it doesn't matter much now, does it?"
That's basically what I was thinking.
Okay, presume the South had a Constitutional right to secede. The minute they do so, they are a foreign country with a foreign government (who fires the first shot, even!), and then the US Congress can legally declare war on them - occupy the land - and bring those states back in once the war is won.
I suppose you could argue they morally shouldn't have done so, but I don't think there are any Constitutional issues involved.
To: Kingasaurus
I suppose you could argue they morally shouldn't have done so, but I don't think there are any Constitutional issues involved. Except, perhaps in the case of Texas, whose status of prewar statehood was accomplished via particularly legally shaky means, and if not valid, more appropriately should have reflected its status as a seperate nation allied with the Confederacy rather than as a state within it. Accordingly, the postwar occupatrion there and *restoration* of its status as a state of the Union may also rest on a foundation of legal sand.
-archy-/-
38 posted on
06/12/2003 8:10:56 AM PDT by
archy
(Keep in mind that the milk of human kindness comes from a beast that is both cannibal and a vampire.)
To: Kingasaurus
Okay, presume the South had a Constitutional right to secede. The minute they do so, they are a foreign country with a foreign government (who fires the first shot, even!), and then the US Congress can legally declare war on them - occupy the land - and bring those states back in once the war is won. Yeah, these southern slave holding yahoos want to seceed and then continue to claim Constitutional protection. But by seceeding they become a foreign power no longer covered by the US Constitution, and by attacking US fortifications, they become a hostile foreign power. Because their slavery system was immoral, they are an immoral hostile foreign power.
Then they get their butts whipped, the immoral institution of slavery is immediately overthrown -- and they have been calling the "whaaaambulance" ever since.
40 posted on
06/12/2003 8:13:44 AM PDT by
jlogajan
To: Kingasaurus; Aurelius; stainlessbanner
The minute they do so, they are a foreign country with a foreign government (who fires the first shot, even!), and then the US Congress can legally declare war on them - occupy the land - and bring those states back in once the war is won. If I'm not mistaken,,Congress did not declare war until 3 months after Lincoln had ordered the invasion of the South.
89 posted on
06/12/2003 12:00:03 PM PDT by
SCDogPapa
(In Dixie Land I'll take my stand to live and die in Dixie)
To: Kingasaurus; Aurelius; stainlessbanner
The minute they do so, they are a foreign country with a foreign government (who fires the first shot, even!), and then the US Congress can legally declare war on them - occupy the land - and bring those states back in once the war is won. If I'm not mistaken,,Congress did not declare war until 3 months after Lincoln had ordered the invasion of the South.
90 posted on
06/12/2003 12:00:04 PM PDT by
SCDogPapa
(In Dixie Land I'll take my stand to live and die in Dixie)
To: Kingasaurus; Aurelius; stainlessbanner
The minute they do so, they are a foreign country with a foreign government (who fires the first shot, even!), and then the US Congress can legally declare war on them - occupy the land - and bring those states back in once the war is won. If I'm not mistaken,,Congress did not declare war until 3 months after Lincoln had ordered the invasion of the South.
91 posted on
06/12/2003 12:00:04 PM PDT by
SCDogPapa
(In Dixie Land I'll take my stand to live and die in Dixie)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson