Opps, don't misunderstand; there are two subjects there,
the crap that some would rather believe about the "Eltanin antenna" and the actual Eltanin Impact. There is no intent to imply the impact is in the same calss as the "antenna".
One has nothing to do with the other; one is pseudoscientific crap; the other an event. It is unfortunate that they are linked.
The calculations I mention were honest & real calcs, in a real study, by an atmospheric physicist, an oceanographer, and another physicist. They were apropos to the event portion of the post; and the prior observation, by someone else, that it would be a 'major kill event'. They help to scale and explain the mechanism of such a 'kill', and bring in factors not usually mentioned in relation to a large impact.
As to GGG pings, I read a lot of the archaelogical matterial you alert to, though often don't comment, especially the Euro-Americas related information. Ditto for the "Graves" portion of GGG. Often, I don't have time to more than read the articles, skipping the following posts altogether.
It was you, after all, that said you didn't recall Churchward writing much about Atlantis. I was just explaining the reason I even mentioned him, in the context of what some would choose to believe in, (the subject of the other post responded to) rather than mundane real explanation of the "mysterious photo". I know I'm not the only one guilty of a bit of late night silliness on some of these threads, and if it confuses or offends you, I'm sorry. I'll try to refrain, though that is rather temperamentally difficult for me.
Most probably, I should not respond to more than one post at a time, in a compound econo-reply.
In short, keep the GGG pings coming.
Thanks, I just didn't know if you were displeased with the initial post. Originally, I mentioned the Eltanin Antenna because it was discovered, hmm, I guess during the same (1960?) seafloor study in which the research ship the Eltanin discovered the impact evidence. :')
We need to remember that, when that "antenna" was first photographed, no one knew what it was. Not sure when the offbeat explanations began, although I think it was discussed in that page Junior linked to. I don't consider it pseudoscience, because I doubt that anyone ever purported it to be a scientific explanation.