Skip to comments.
Saddam's WMD and terrorist connections all proven in one document!!!
Ray Robison Blog ^
| March 20, 2006
| Ray Robison
Posted on 03/21/2006 9:59:48 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Lots of work required to cloud the issues.
41
posted on
03/21/2006 2:14:17 PM PST
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Most excellent Ernest, proves what we already know... we have to get it out.
I'm in the process of going through the old threads and links I have, feel free to cross check names as they come up.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1470208/posts
Will send more later... and we have to restart a new thread to put all our links together... from Clinton or even before... up to now.
Thanks again, Robinson is great.
42
posted on
03/21/2006 2:57:59 PM PST
by
AliVeritas
(“Pacifism is objectively pro-Islamo-Fascist.”)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
To: eyespysomething
44
posted on
03/21/2006 5:55:12 PM PST
by
TheLion
To: Kimberly GG
"I've already had people reply to my posts (on other sites) regarding these documents quote the disclaimer back at me "The US Government has made no determination regarding the authenticity of the documents, validity or factual accuracy of the information contained therein, or the quality of any translations, when available." I get that thrown at me repeatedly!"
Every time someone throws this at you, repeat the first seven words. "The US Government has made NO determination". Then tell them that no does not mean the government has made a negative determination, but has made NO determination.
To: mjaneangels@aolcom
Ironic that the people who hate the US government, are the same ones who refuse to acknowledge documents unless they are authenticated by the US Government (which they hate).
46
posted on
03/22/2006 12:56:28 AM PST
by
syriacus
(Would fewer Americans have died in Iraq if the French and Germans had helped depose Saddam?)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
To: mjaneangels@aolcom
"Every time someone throws this at you, repeat the first seven words. "The US Government has made NO determination". Then tell them that no does not mean the government has made a negative determination, but has made NO determination."
thanks......good catch...I can be a bit slow on the draw these days!
To: syriacus
"Ironic that the people who hate the US government, are the same ones who refuse to acknowledge documents unless they are authenticated by the US Government (which they hate)."
You are right. I hadn't thought of it that way.
To: Kimberly GG
"thanks......good catch...I can be a bit slow on the draw these days!"
Your welcome. One of the big reasons I come here is to consider other people's ideas. I don't always agree with anyone, but I do consider ideas.
To: Kimberly GG
He constantly keeps repeating that 'even Saddam's deputies/lieutenants were shocked to find out there really were NO wmds. It is well known that Saddam's surrounded himself with circles within circles of trusted advisors. There were only a handful of people who he acknowledged WMD with. For an excellent example of this read find and read the following document ISGQ-2003-M0004665 . Saddam begins a frank and honest discussion that moves from geopolitics to WMD and sanctions. Present are Male 1-Saddam, Male 2-Tariq, Male 3-Unknown). Then halfway through the meeting, Males 4,5,6 join and the entire discussion changes. With Male 4,5,6 present, nonone admits that WMD were made. Here are some examples from the WMD admissions in the 'open' part of the discussion.
Male 2 (Comrade Tariq)
The main obstacle is the biological file. How did this issue progress? They themselves closed the biological file. They closed it before they found out about the complete deal for the materials. They said we see the remaining quantity, 14 or 15, Lt Gen Amir knows the numbers, and they didnt see a problem. I know our comrades worked very hard after 1991, they worked 26 hours in a 24hour period. They erased everything.
So they were concentrating their efforts on the biological issue, and its a small program compared to the chemical, missile and nuclear programs. And the Special Committees capabilities turned out to be even smaller than our program. Meaning their experts and equipment and capabilities are too small to deal with the Iraqi program in such a short period of time.
So they closed it and werent talking about it. But when they found out about the materials that we bought, they opened their eyes and
Male 1 (saddam)
But they could find out about these materials fasters than the other things that they discovered, because we bought them from the west
Male 2 (Comrade Tariq)
True Sir, but the information that came to the Special Committee didnt all come at the same time. They get some information, then a little more, and so on and so forth. So it looks like they got the information in the fall of last year. At the same time as the Kuwait issue and the crisis that happened then, Ekeus came and emphasized it. Right now Sir, this is a meeting of the highest leadership in our country, we did actually produce biological weapons. Its not a lie to say that we worked in this field. And the materials that came here came for this purpose, not for the medical use like we told the Special Committee. So when theres proof, you are a man of law, when theres a case in a court, and theres proof, it leads to the conclusion. So the conclusion that the Special Committee came to is correct, its not a lie. The conclusion said that you imported a large quantity of materials that are used for medical purposes, and at the same time they are raw materials to produce biological weapons. You said its for medical purposes, using it for medical purposes only requires kilograms not tons. Meaning that the Ministry of Health can use 200 kilograms the entire year for examinations, but it doesnt use 37 tons. We tried to tell them about mistakes that could happen, and how Health Ministers
They see two issues sir, they see some very efficient and accurate actions from us, and they see some mistakes. But when we exaggerate the mistake, theyll say: you guys are efficient and accurate, know exactly how to work a machine, you were able to establish this big military program with little resources, nobody helped you, but you want us to believe that buying 37 tons was by mistake?
They you have it. Admission in front of Saddam that 'we did actually produce biological weapons'. Also note that before he stated that, he also stated the following, 'this is a meeting of the highest leadership in our country'. Wonder who Male 3 was ?
To: justa-hairyape
Slight correction. Replace 'With Male 4,5,6 present, nonone admits that WMD were made.' to 'With Male 4,5,6 present, noone admitted any WMD beyond what the UN already knew.'
BTW - Males 4,5,6 may have included the Information Minister and the Foriegn Minister.
To: justa-hairyape
And just to rub salt in George Clooney's wounds.
Thats V for Vindication !
ps - The 'open' geopolitical discussion at the beginning of that docement is fascinating.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Please note - Jveritas has discovered that Line 1 in the english field translation for this document is incorrect. Dont know what you want to do about. Perhaps just delete line 1 and any posts or info specifically related to line 1. You might want to contact the blogger that posted this document.
To: justa-hairyape
Is this the line?
1. The Iraqi government will distribute the same leaflets that the American forces are distributing but it will contain anthrax.
To: All
To: All
Ignore that second link just above ,,,post #56,.....
*************************
To: justa-hairyape
Starting to get mu confusion straightened out......From
JVERITAS - TRANSLATING THE IRAQ DOCUMENTS Blog: Tuesday, March 28, 2006
***********************************************
Sorry all, I posted a translation which had been done by someone other than jveritas, and had not been reviewed for accuracy. I pulled the incorrect translation.
As per jveritas:
There is a major problem with the original translation of the document by whoever translated, in fact the English translation was attached to the original pdf posted on the Pentagon site together with the Arabic text and the translation was not accurate in the first sentence and hence it is causing major misunderstanding by whoever is reading it. This is basically an Iraq intelligence report talking about what Radio SAWA (Pro US radio in the Middle East) is reporting about Iraqi are going to use leaflets with Antrax and such, it was not an order to the Iraqi army to do so as it is has been interpreted by many.
To: justa-hairyape; jveritas; nopardons; eyespysomething; AliVeritas; Marine_Uncle; ...
Hattip to justa-hairyape for the alert to me.....and now for the Grand Award to
jveritas
Now he is not only doing translations of the documents ,,,,,he is correcting some of the translations done by others prior to his seeing them .
Way to go JV!!!!
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Yes, but in the MSM's (and Democrats') eyes, anthrax is not a WMD. A WMD is a nuclear-tipped missile aimed at Paris, and nothing short of finding a hidden ICBM site full of them is going to get them to stop spinning.
60
posted on
03/29/2006 10:05:17 AM PST
by
Mr. Jeeves
("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson