Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Media Wall - Part 1or The Fight For the Hearts and Minds of Americans
Rustbelt Holy Land ^ | November, 10th, 2006 | Rich Root

Posted on 11/10/2006 7:07:53 PM PST by sizzlemeister

RBHL, NY - The Republicans lost the House and Senate this November 7, 2006 after months and months of bitter battles on both the local and national fronts. However, the war did not start this election cycle, rather it has been on-going since the McCarthy era and perhaps longer.

What war? The war for the hearts and minds of the American people. The combatants are the Socialists disguised as members of the Democrat party against the Conservatives entrenched within the Republican party. The Socialists have adopted the classic tools of propaganda, the media and the schools; just like the Nazis did, just like the Soviets, just like the Chinese Communists, and about any other political party seeking to manipulate the masses. Is it any wonder they scream and cry ”foul” when opposing points of view penetrate deep into society? To them, the baseline is the socialist/liberal Democrat point of view from which all other ideas are judged, and they have succeeded in “normalizing” this narrative: for all intents and purposes in 2006 the gate-keepers of popular culture and mainstream information are the Socialist-leftists.

Read the entire posting at Rustbelt Holy Land.

(Excerpt) Read more at rustbeltholyland.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2008; conservatives; infowar; media; msm
This article heralds an on-going symposium on how to get Conservative ideas and principles to penetrate accurately into American society. The MSM will not do this and we can not EVER expect them to. We must develop strategies for bypassing the MSM, including the FNC and even Conservative-friendly publications. The FNC is not a reliable outlet as has been demonstrated the past year (Hannity notwithstanding). Papers and magazines simply do not penetrate deep enough.
1 posted on 11/10/2006 7:07:54 PM PST by sizzlemeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sizzlemeister

And much of Talk Radio has become unreliable because the Talk Show hosts are now the new gatekeeps and mainly are bending their personal defenition of Conservativims to fit their own feelings on an issue by issue bases. They are more often then not merely regurgitating the same story lines as the MSM. Thus they are more the the MSM echo chamber then the Conservatives contact point.

Mark Levin has a very clever show. He is in direct contact with his fans via Free Republic. Thus he has thousands of contact points thru out the world with all sorts of expertise and insite. Thus via Freeper Conservatives have ways to challenge and and correct erronous story lines from the MSM AND force correction. They also have an avenue for getting their message out untainted by the MSM or other gatekeeper.

Roadblock? Mass Market Penetration. How do we get outside to reach others who do not find us on their own?


2 posted on 11/10/2006 7:20:11 PM PST by MNJohnnie (The Democrat Party: Hard on Taxpayers, Soft on Terrorism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sizzlemeister
bump --

I don't know if it would work or not, but if EVERYONE on the right would just stop talking to the DBM -- no interviews, no comments, nothing. It's worked for Hillary - she did give an interview to Alan Colmes but that's as far away from her comfort zone as she's ever allowed herself to go.

3 posted on 11/10/2006 7:28:21 PM PST by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch (good fences make good neighbors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Roadblock? Mass Market Penetration. How do we get outside to reach others who do not find us on their own?

That's precisely the question. We need answers! I love Mark and Rush. Rush being perhaps the most deeply-penetrating major medium we have. However, in most cases talk radio is preaching to the choir. Indeed, most Conservative ideas that are presented accurately only hit Conservatives, whereas Socialist-leftist ideology permeates EVERYTHING. The latter is "the norm", the baseline. This is what needs to be focused on - how to deflate or defeat this baseline and, if not neutralize its effect, turn it in our favor.

4 posted on 11/10/2006 7:28:34 PM PST by sizzlemeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
I don't know if it would work or not, but if EVERYONE on the right would just stop talking to the DBM -- no interviews, no comments, nothing. It's worked for Hillary - she did give an interview to Alan Colmes but that's as far away from her comfort zone as she's ever allowed herself to go.

Absolutely -that's one thing I had in mind. That would be one exceptionally effective, and bold, strategy. The challenge will be in being prepared for the reaction by the MSM to that strategy. As a former newsanchor/reporter I can tell you it would drive the MSM bonkers to be ignored. It would, however, put us in a position to drive the dialogue - but the dialogue at the outset will be WHY the MSM is being ignored, and then if the MSM deserves to be ignored. The actual substance of our argument will be avoided as much as possible for as long as possible. We'd need to be impeccably prepared to steer the reaction. Eventually I'd like to start a list of all possible, reasonable, strategies. If anyone has something sane to contribute, please do.

5 posted on 11/10/2006 7:34:21 PM PST by sizzlemeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sizzlemeister
So how do we get our side to implement that strategy?

The very first order of business would be (imho) to kick that Gregory guy out of the WH news conferences, as well as anyone who buried a question in the middle of a monologue.

6 posted on 11/10/2006 7:48:55 PM PST by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch (good fences make good neighbors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
First everyone would have to agree on the strategy, flesh out the details, devise follow up strategies, etc. etc.

And, as far as the WH goes, I doubt at this point they'd be on board for something like this. The WH would require different strategies, and, frankly, a different mindset than they've displayed since the election.

This is why we need to convene and discuss the matter as thoroughly, but expeditiously, as possible - each strategy or activity can't occur in a vacuum, this war needs to be fought as synergistically as possible.

7 posted on 11/10/2006 8:02:03 PM PST by sizzlemeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sizzlemeister
Okay, so maybe study the data -- is it Accuracy in Media? which compiles the frequency of negative stories/positive stories as they relate to political parties? Obviously a great many studies would be needed.

Wait and see who is at the helm of the different branches of the GOP after the first of the year, (hopefully someone with a spine) and then they could make an announcement, prefaced by the data, and then state, "therefore, our side will no longer try to get our message out through the following organizations" or something like that.???

8 posted on 11/10/2006 8:37:51 PM PST by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch (good fences make good neighbors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sizzlemeister
Civilian Irregular Information Defense Group

Cyber-militia.

Distributed Information Operations in denied InfoWar battlespace.

9 posted on 11/10/2006 9:29:18 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Either we bring them freedom, or they destroy us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Bookmarking!
10 posted on 11/10/2006 11:00:42 PM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon; Cannonette; All

If you like it, get with Cannonette about posting something on it. We are looking for collaborators to keep the blog alive while I am at the mercy of MWR Internet Cafes.


11 posted on 11/10/2006 11:22:18 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Either we bring them freedom, or they destroy us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal; Chickenhawk Warmonger; onyx

ping


12 posted on 11/10/2006 11:24:55 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Either we bring them freedom, or they destroy us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sizzlemeister
Pamphleteers and Samizdat
13 posted on 11/10/2006 11:31:42 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Either we bring them freedom, or they destroy us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sizzlemeister
There are a few lessons to be learned from this election, and they are all sad. First, Americans no longer have any stomach for military casualties. It's almost to the point where maybe we should close down the armed services and lower the taxes. If we can't get any soldiers hurt, why have them? The public now seems to think that joining the service is kind of like college in uniform, and it's an outrage if someone gets killed. It's a disaster cause we've had 3000 killed in four years. We lost something like 1500 drowned in accidents training for D-Day! If this is the case, perhaps we should just have some ICBMs and have the policy that if we are attacked, we will fire them. Second, the elections are decided not by the thinking, interested, educated people that read and write blogs, whether left or right, but by dummies who know a heck of a lot more about JLo and K-Fed than Middle East history, let alone economic theory. Third, as long as the libs control the mass media, which is still mostly seen by the dummies as unbiased and the truth, they can control what the dummies believe. The dummies have a tv mentality. All problems are black and white, and the heroes do nothing wrong and make no mistakes, only the obvious bad guys are killed, and all problems are neatly wrapped up within a half hour to three hours. Does it not strike you as truly odd that Americans would be content with election results that are applauded by Al Qaeda, Hugo Chavez, Danny Ortega and the French...and not be appalled? Picture running a candidate in 1943 who is approved by Hitler, Mussolini and Tojo! Republicans traditionally have to appeal on the basis of historical examples (socialism fails, welfare states fail, aggressors have to be militarily defeated or they keep aggressing) while libs appeal on cuteness, emotion, and "wouldn't it be nice if you got that for free?". Republicans keep trying to explain theory, libs call them heartless nasty racists. Hard to see hope as long as they control the media, and dumb down public education. How many people try to historically educate themselves? How many watch Dancing with the Stars instead? Libs understand this...suddenly Hillary's opposition is Barack Obama. Ok, why? What has he ever said or done to merit this consideration? He's simply a photogenic black guy who can speak well, who has a appealing "uplifting" backstory...what are his opinions or positions? Does anyone know? But he'd be a favorite on American Idol, most likely....truly sad. Right now probably the best person in the country to be president is Newt Gingrich..and he doesn't stand a chance because he's not cute and the media convinced everyone he was nasty and evil some years ago. I fear for the country more and more..and have no idea how to change it besides somehow overthrowing the media that Joe Average takes in more or less like air.

Posted by: jaeger51 at November 11, 2006 12:10 AM

14 posted on 11/11/2006 12:09:01 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Either we bring them freedom, or they destroy us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Pamphleteers and Samizdat

Nice read, thanks for the link.

I agree with the sentiment and the spirit. Blogs are indeed the modern pamphleteers. I don't think, though, that we should be content with blogs alone (and I'm not saying that is your suggestion). Our mass-mediated culture has a severe lack of patience for doing simple things like reading lots of words and the opposition can easily draw their attention with mindless blinky lights. Anything that appeals to the intellectual laziness of the masses is a distraction. We need our own blinky lights to compete with theirs.

15 posted on 11/11/2006 10:22:03 AM PST by sizzlemeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sizzlemeister

We need our own Hollywood, but we aren't likely to get one any time soon. Generally speaking, stereotypically actors, writers, and show business types are not reality-based hard-headed conservative realists. Ronald Reagan came from that, and maybe the Governator can help, but in my opinion the entertainment industry attracts a lot of narcissists who are much more comfortable in the Democrat Party.


16 posted on 11/11/2006 10:50:48 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Either we bring them freedom, or they destroy us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Hi ya, CN4,
Whay happened to our Richard Mellon Scaithe? We need a deep pocket's soros on our side. Wait, Scaithe was painted evil and soros gets a free ride.


17 posted on 11/11/2006 10:53:32 AM PST by onyx (I'm now a minority and victim of the democrats, but with full and free entitlements!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Cannoneer - as always you are right on the money. I've lost faith in a number of the "big" name blogs after this election. Instead of focusing on what the problem is and how to solve it, they have resorted to beating up on the President (again). I love your ideas and you know that I will do whatever I can. Look at the success of Kos - as much as I hate to admit it. We've got to get the message out in the open and in the public debate.


18 posted on 11/11/2006 12:49:17 PM PST by Chickenhawk Warmonger (All aboard the Chickenhawk Express... www.chickenhawkexpress.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

"We need our own Hollywood"


We dont need to use the old one.
Something new perhaps.
Lots of streaming vids out there on the internet.
I think more and more people are watching on the internet now.


Another thing I wonder about is all the Veterans coming back from the war on terror.

There must be some of them angry enough to start running for office.

We have been cheated our heroes by the MSM.
The people know more about Abu Graib then they do the tales of our heroes, their major battles and stories are left untold by the MSM.

We have to start thinking in new ways to defeat the old media. to me this is mission number one if we do not want to see dems continue to win over Joe and Jane Swingvote.


19 posted on 11/12/2006 11:05:14 AM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson