Posted on 12/12/2006 5:28:00 PM PST by Stone Mountain
A devil food is turning our kids into homosexuals
Posted: December 12, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern
There's a slow poison out there that's severely damaging our children and threatening to tear apart our culture. The ironic part is, it's a "health food," one of our most popular.
Now, I'm a health-food guy, a fanatic who seldom allows anything into his kitchen unless it's organic. I state my bias here just so you'll know I'm not anti-health food.
The dangerous food I'm speaking of is soy. Soybean products are feminizing, and they're all over the place. You can hardly escape them anymore.
I have nothing against an occasional soy snack. Soy is nutritious and contains lots of good things. Unfortunately, when you eat or drink a lot of soy stuff, you're also getting substantial quantities of estrogens.
Estrogens are female hormones. If you're a woman, you're flooding your system with a substance it can't handle in surplus. If you're a man, you're suppressing your masculinity and stimulating your "female side," physically and mentally.
In fetal development, the default is being female. All humans (even in old age) tend toward femininity. The main thing that keeps men from diverging into the female pattern is testosterone, and testosterone is suppressed by an excess of estrogen.
If you're a grownup, you're already developed, and you're able to fight off some of the damaging effects of soy. Babies aren't so fortunate. Research is now showing that when you feed your baby soy formula, you're giving him or her the equivalent of five birth control pills a day. A baby's endocrine system just can't cope with that kind of massive assault, so some damage is inevitable. At the extreme, the damage can be fatal.
Soy is feminizing, and commonly leads to a decrease in the size of the penis, sexual confusion and homosexuality. That's why most of the medical (not socio-spiritual) blame for today's rise in homosexuality must fall upon the rise in soy formula and other soy products. (Most babies are bottle-fed during some part of their infancy, and one-fourth of them are getting soy milk!) Homosexuals often argue that their homosexuality is inborn because "I can't remember a time when I wasn't homosexual." No, homosexuality is always deviant. But now many of them can truthfully say that they can't remember a time when excess estrogen wasn't influencing them.
Doctors used to hope soy would reduce hot flashes, prevent cancer and heart disease, and save millions in the Third World from starvation. That was before they knew much about long-term soy use. Now we know it's a classic example of a cure that's worse than the disease. For example, if your baby gets colic from cow's milk, do you switch him to soy milk? Don't even think about it. His phytoestrogen level will jump to 20 times normal. If he is a she, brace yourself for watching her reach menarche as young as seven, robbing her of years of childhood. If he is a boy, it's far worse: He may not reach puberty till much later than normal.
Research in 2000 showed that a soy-based diet at any age can lead to a weak thyroid, which commonly produces heart problems and excess fat. Could this explain the dramatic increase in obesity today?
Recent research on rats shows testicular atrophy, infertility and uterus hypertrophy (enlargement). This helps explain the infertility epidemic and the sudden growth in fertility clinics. But alas, by the time a soy-damaged infant has grown to adulthood and wants to marry, it's too late to get fixed by a fertility clinic.
Worse, there's now scientific evidence that estrogen ingredients in soy products may be boosting the rapidly rising incidence of leukemia in children. In the latest year we have numbers for, new cases in the U.S. jumped 27 percent. In one year!
There's also a serious connection between soy and cancer in adults – especially breast cancer. That's why the governments of Israel, the UK, France and New Zealand are already cracking down hard on soy.
In sad contrast, 60 percent of the refined foods in U.S. supermarkets now contain soy. Worse, soy use may double in the next few years because (last I heard) the out-of-touch medicrats in the FDA hierarchy are considering allowing manufacturers of cereal, energy bars, fake milk, fake yogurt, etc., to claim that "soy prevents cancer." It doesn't.
P.S.: Soy sauce is fine. Unlike soy milk, it's perfectly safe because it's fermented, which changes its molecular structure. Miso, natto and tempeh are also OK, but avoid tofu.
I made this devil's food cake for you without any soy, using only real whole cow's milk and real eggs. I promise it will not do anything but increase masculinity, why, it might even be called the *Wonder Bread* of chocolate cakes in that it will "build strong bodies 12 ways."
Dr. Mercola - "Soy formula is one of the worst foods that you could feed your child. Not only does it have profoundly adverse hormonal effects as discussed above, but it also has over 1000% more aluminum than conventional milk based formulas.
Why Soy Can Damage Your Health
http://www.mercola.com/article/soy/index.htm
Soy May Cause Cancer and Brain Damage
http://www.mercola.com/2000/aug/20/soy_dangers.htm
The Truth about Soy
http://www.soyonlineservice.co.nz/
Beware of The Toxicity of Soy Products
http://www.shirleys-wellness-cafe.com/soy.htm
Mercola is no better at providing factual information based on sound science than the rest of your links. All this nonsense about soy is nothing more than alarmist propagated by the toxic terrorists who are either misguided scientists or charlatans trying to make a quick buck -- or both.
Even worse, they've discovered a food that reduces a woman's sex drive by 90%. It's called a Wedding Cake.
I ate szechuan tofu today for lunch, but it does not make me want to look at some guys hairy @$$.
"All this nonsense about soy is nothing more than alarmist propagated by the toxic terrorists who are either misguided scientists or charlatans trying to make a quick buck -- or both."
I assume you can back up what you stated here with proof based in fact.
FYI:
"As currently configured, the FDA is not able to adequately protect the American public. It's more interested in protecting the interests of industry. It views industry as its client, and the client is someone whose interest you represent."
- Dr. David Graham, senior drug safety researcher at the Food and Drug Administration, and Vioxx whistleblower
http://www.organicconsumers.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.pl?archive=1&num=947
Sure. Without linking me to endless studies from Mercola or some other alarmist source, what specifically do believe is dangerous about soy?
Hahaha, South Park flash - "So big!" ;)
Good grief. You don't understand the FDA at all. The FDA is motivated by politics, public opinion and not making mistakes. Just because some researcher makes a claim doesn't make it so. The FDA and industry, for the most part, have a very adversarial relationship. They have nothing to gain from helping industry. The FDA treats industry as bad as everyone else.
They are certainly not perfect or infallible but they are absolutely light years better than what existed before. They are bureaucrats of the worst kind who sit on drugs and treatments that could save or improve lives because they're scared to make a mistake however, we operate better than any other country in the world.
BTW, I believe Vioxx will make it back to the market but with many more limitations, despite what Dr. Graham, disgruntled former employee, has to say. Of course, that's besides the point. Humans have been consuming soy for thousands of years. We consume more today per capita then ever before. Our health and life expectancy have never been better. If the FDA had solid research proving that soy was harmful, especially to children, they'd act on it. They don't because that research doesn't exist.
Better watch out, or you'll become feminine.
Good grief, that was from the article, not me....
Are you saying only the FDA has credibility?
It's good to be the King ...
....there is a certain humor value; I'm LMAO right now.
I've worked with the FDA on the food side of the industry and I would agree that they are credible, although they can be a bureaucratic nightmare. Our food supply offers the most variety greatest safety in the world. There is no love between industry and the FDA. From what I know about the drug side, their relationship depends on who is running the agency but that their relationship is also highly adversarial. You can understand why that would be when the cost of bringing a new drug to market is now $800 million. I am unfamiliar with the medical equipment area of their oversight.
Soy is also damaging to the thyroid. Women who are having problems losing weight despite diet and exercise should make absolutely sure they eliminate soy from their diet.
Baloney, I just had a glass of soy milk. Now excuse me, I'm going to spin some Striesand records and do some home redecorating. Maybe chiffon.
Not only does soy contain estrogens, they are genetically modifying it on a regular basis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.