Posted on 05/24/2007 4:30:22 AM PDT by theothercheek
Hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants tramping through fragile ecosystems and wildlife refuges discarding hundreds of thousands of tons of trash have caused incalculable environmental damage in Arizona’s Sonoran desert and the Rio Grande Valley. Yet, for reasons ranging from fear of alienating lefty donors to concerns over cutting off animal migration routes, environmentalists are opposed to border control measures.
The Associated Press reports that environmentalists who have acquired and preserved 90,000 riverfront acres of Texas scrub and forest in the Rio Grande Valley over the past 30 years object to Department of Homeland Security’s plans to erect 70 miles of fencing on wildlife refuges along the border with Mexico:
[T]hey fear the hundreds of miles of border fences will undo their work and kill some land animals by cutting them off from the Rio Grande, the only source of fresh water.
A fence could also prevent the ocelots and other animals from swimming across the water to mate with partners on the other side. …
Homeland Security spokesman Russ Knocke said environmental concerns will be taken into account in the final decisions. But Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff has used his authority to waive environmental regulations for security reasons in other states, and Knocke said he would do so in the Rio Grande Valley if necessary. …
The refuges show signs of immigrant activity - food wrappers and water jugs, discarded wet clothing, the plastic bags used to carry a change of clothing across the river. Similar evidence is found up and down the river, despite the presence of Border Patrol agents and the sensors and cameras that make up the current "virtual" fence.
One environmental impact study suggests that the actual damage caused by illegal immigration is far worse than the hypothetical harm fencing could cause.
Leftists first, greenies second I guess.
Yup. They are “Watermelon” enviormentalists. Green on the outside, red on the inside.
Yesterday they were worried about over-population.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1838642/posts
Make up your damned mind!
You have to first have a mind in order to be able to make it up!
But they don’t have a brain. Only straw.....(break into song)
Haven’t they ever heard of animals digging holes under fences or climbing over them?
I have had ruined vegetable patches over the years to prove your point. Guess “environmentalists” don’t know much about animals.
Leftists first, greenies second I guess.
Exactly. I have always wondered why groups like the Sierra Club have been relatively silent on the issue of illegal immigration. After all, the thought of tens or even hundreds of millions of more people seems at odds with maintaining a pristine environment, right?
The truth is that many leftists live in cities and consider environmentalism a convenient tool with which to batter conservatives. They probably justify it by thinking that all these immigrants will vote for Dems who, in turn, will be better at protecting the environment. While there is a certain (twisted) logic to this, the massive amount of growth required to accomodate the increased population will just accelerate urban sprawl and pressure on the ecosystem.
Before I click, it would be nice to know who the author is. There’s a place on the form for posting an article to enter the author’s name, in case you missed it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.