Posted on 01/07/2008 1:59:21 PM PST by SmithL
SFGate printed a rebuttal from CAIR to my column, "Savage vs. CAIR: The Battle over Free Speech" today titled, "Free Speech vs. Hate Speech."
It consists of the usual CAIR talking points and obfuscation and the author, CAIR-San Francisco Bay Area Executive Director Safaa Ibrahim, demonstrates a marked lack of understanding (whether purposeful or not) of the concept of free speech. In addition, she doesn't disprove any of the allegations made in my article. And, if the reader comments are any indication, the American public isn't buying it.
Update (1/5): Conservatarian weighs in on CAIR's "dissimulation" here and Douglas Hagmann of the Northeast Intelligence Network provides some words of wisdom on the subject here.
(Excerpt) Read more at cinnamonstillwell.blogspot.com ...
Savage vs. CAIR: The battle over free speech
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 12/19/7 | Cinnamon Stillwell
Free speech vs. hate speech
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 1/4/8 | Safaa Ibrahim
There may be a misunderstanding among CAIR advocates about libel law. What works in England may not work in the US where there are different standards/definitions of “libel” (for example several passages in Bill Clinton’s autobiography had to be altered for the UK edition of his book).
An Amish farmer walking through his field, notices a man drinking from his pond.
The Amish farmer shouts: “Trink das wasser nicht. Die kuhen haben dahin gesheissen.”
Which means: “Don’t drink the water, the cows have shit in it.”
The man shouts back: “I’m a Muslim, I don’t understand. Please speak in English.”
The Amish farmer says: “Use two hands. You’ll get more.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.