Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

What a surprise!!!
1 posted on 01/11/2008 4:03:49 PM PST by hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: hope

They think Romney is the weak one?

So does that mean they think Fred is the strong candidate? If that is now the case, I’d have to agree with them. If they think it’s Huckabeta, they’d be wrong.


2 posted on 01/11/2008 4:06:18 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

This is why Alaska has a closed primary. Neither side should meddle with the election process of the other.


3 posted on 01/11/2008 4:07:46 PM PST by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Democrats spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

Is this further proof that there is no difference between the Democratic candidates? No need even to vote. Any will do.


4 posted on 01/11/2008 4:07:51 PM PST by kc8ukw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

The Huckster would assure a 40 state Democrat sweep. A Romney win might actually give Fred a shot in South Carolina so the Dumbocrats aren’t thinking about the next move.


5 posted on 01/11/2008 4:08:04 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

Scared of Fred.


6 posted on 01/11/2008 4:09:17 PM PST by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

It’s Fred or bust for me. If you think that Rudy or Huck is a better candidate then you need to go back and look at what you stand for.


8 posted on 01/11/2008 4:10:47 PM PST by Jaysun (It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope
PhotobucketPhotobucket
10 posted on 01/11/2008 4:13:22 PM PST by rfp1234 (Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

I could deal with Mitt, if only he could really decide what he stood for and stand by it for sure. I don’t quite trust him, but I’d rather have him than any of the Democratic candidates. Thompson would be ideal, though. I would love to see him up.


11 posted on 01/11/2008 4:15:30 PM PST by figgers3036
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

Can’t really blame them.


12 posted on 01/11/2008 4:15:58 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

Fred08.com is almost at $750,000 for SC. The goal by today was $500,000.


18 posted on 01/11/2008 4:21:02 PM PST by manic4organic (Send a care package through USO today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

I’m no Romney fan but Romney isn’t exactly the candidate that would be easiest to beat.


19 posted on 01/11/2008 4:21:12 PM PST by cripplecreek (Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope
DailyKos to Dems: Vote Romney!

Interesting...its the same mantra of some of our more liberal brethren here on FR.

U.S. Army Retired


20 posted on 01/11/2008 4:21:33 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (REAGAN: "..party..must represent certain fundamental beliefs [not] compromised..[for] expediency")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

Yup...they realize the Romulan is the easiest to defeat!


21 posted on 01/11/2008 4:22:49 PM PST by meandog (I'm one of the FEW and the BRAVE FReepers still supporting John McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Not surprising at all to me. Mitt is a chameleon. If he is the republican nominee many conservatives might stay home or vote third party because they don’t trust what he says.


25 posted on 01/11/2008 5:11:34 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

That sure sucks the wind out of any Slick Willard victory.

He needs the KOSsacks to win. LOL


27 posted on 01/11/2008 5:14:47 PM PST by Petronski (Slick Willard is just McCain's stalking horse. There's a corrupt bargain afoot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope

It would be such a pleasant change to all the liberal votes for McCain.


35 posted on 01/11/2008 6:17:21 PM PST by bmwcyle (Joy Behar ain't no Saint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope
How nice that the democrats are filleting each other without any outside help.
38 posted on 01/11/2008 6:19:24 PM PST by bannie (Jimminy Cricket is hollering, "Beware!!! clintons CHEAT!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hope
So the rats that would switch over and vote Mitt, who normally be the ones to vote for Obama, so it essance, they take votes away from Obama to give to Hillary?

WTF?

39 posted on 01/11/2008 6:31:11 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (To Err Is Human. To Arr is Pirate. To Unnngh! is Freeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson