Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BykrBayb
If a 19 year old male impregnated a 15 year old girl, I doubt you'd be able to post a response since you'd have a pitchfork in one hand and a torch in the other. But since the tables are turned and the boy was the victim of statutory rape, he must PAY!
11 posted on 08/18/2008 11:58:41 AM PDT by Doohickey (Wingnut: A small, dense object that spins easily (See: Obama, Barack))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Doohickey

Actually, I think they should both take responsibility for their own behavior. I don’t know when that started to be frowned upon in so-called conservative circles.

Children are not punishment. They are to be loved and taken care of. Hating your former spouse (or one-night-stand) is no reason to disown your own children.


12 posted on 08/18/2008 12:01:54 PM PDT by BykrBayb (We're a non Soros non lefitst supporting maverick Gang of 3, who won't be voting for McCain. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Doohickey

Regardless of whether or not the tables were turned, both people involved in the conception would still be held responsible for raising the baby. Had it been reversed, the girl would have gotten custody of the baby and would still have been responsible for raising the child. Just because the boy is the victim in this case doesn’t mean he can dodge his responsibilities any more than the girl would have been able to had she been the victim.

The big difference if the tables had been turned would be that the girl would have had the option of choosing an abortion, the boy had no such option available to him.


27 posted on 08/18/2008 12:56:14 PM PDT by contemplator (Capitalism gets no Rock Concerts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson