1% of the population is gay.
98% of the child molesters are male.
40-45% of all the children who are molested are male.
That just does not add up. Shouldn't 98% of the children molested be female, since males make up such a huge part of the perpetrators, and heterosexuals make up such a huge part of the population???
I'm no math genius (and I know some of you folks are, so if you could walk me through this, I'd be much appreciative), but it seems like homosexuals would have to be something like 30 X more likely to be child molesters, right?
If we're to define a homosexual as someone who has sex with people their own gender when given the choice, that is.
He should face the Whirling Blades of Hoo-Ha.
Here’s a hint with statistics on these matters:
If a man is attracted to women, he is not gay. A man who is attracted to men is not a heterosexual. They can be attracted to other things as well but that rule stands.
So if a man has sex with male children or teens, it doesn’t mean he is gay because some of these men are married. It means he is a pervert.
There is no coincidence to the connections between homosexuality and child molestation. The leftwing in this country has had an OBVIOUS agenda of creating Constitutional sexuality rights and in over sexualizing our children. The MSM and Hollyweird are complicit in this agenda. If people do not fight back for their right to representation on the issue of sexuality then eventually the leftwing will try to use the Courts to attack the age of consent. This is the agenda of the leftwing to finally destroy the traditional family unit.