Posted on 03/11/2009 3:25:46 PM PDT by Righting
http://www.peacefaq.com/arabists.htmlArabists, "Pro-Arab Sympathisers"
Frequently Asked Questions:
What motivates the Arabists?
- Arabists in government do not have names like Hamadi or Abdullah. No, they have names like Hendrikson and Smith and they work diligently for the government of America - except when they don't. When they don't, they work first for themselves and then for their Arab connections. They may be in the White House, the State Dept. and the Intelligence Agencies on orders from any of the above.
Then there are corporations who have leases on Arab oil land, contracts, shipping lines, and these executives are plugged into the highest offices of government. They can be generally defined as either motivated by money or as Arabists: meaning they ideologically agree with Arab orders. (Recall how the multinational oil companies accepted orders from Saudi Arabia during the 1973 Yom Kippur War. The orders were to cease delivering oil to American civilian and military depots. These American based corporations followed the Saudi orders and cut off supply.
Strangely, there was no demand for trial or imprisonment - perhaps because they were so well represented in government that they were untouchable.
How have the Arabists betrayed America?
- Perhaps the reader has forgotten the blowing up of the American Marine barracks; or the orders as recorded on tape by Arafat personally ordering the execution of American Ambassador Cleo Noel, Jr. held hostage by Arafat's Force 17 in Khartoum March 1973; or the killing of Leon Klinghoffer off the Achille Lauro; or the bombing of Pan Am 103; or the torture murder of Marine Col. William Higgins; or the World Trade Center bombing; or a thousand other atrocities fomented by a hostile Arab world.
The address of these and a thousand other atrocities is Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya and the PLO who were all kept well-funded by Saudi Arabia. All of these nations who supported terror with money, safe houses, weapons, training bases also had confederates in America. They came from corporations who extracted billions from oil, banking, shipping and construction contracts. The value of their money increased by virtue of their phony escalation of oil prices, fueling world inflation and world hunger. They, in turn, shoveled money into our political system which influenced the Congress and the White House. They became enthusiastic Arabists, thereby opening the doors to terror in America.
Perhaps its time, before the terror begins, to weed out Arabists before we have to find them, after hundreds of Americans are killed by Islamic fundamentalists.
What does the Arabist risk?
- One day there will be payback time for those Americans who helped the Arab countries build conventional and unconventional forces...
...The American people will move from fear into rage and begin to look for those who not only carried out the operations but those in government and industry who assisted in the growth industry of those terror nations and terror organizations.
I can clearly see the day when the FBI begins to interrogate State Department employees at the highest levels. Was it not the Arabists within the State Department who have assisted and protected Syria all these many years? Was it not the State Department who worked covertly with Yassir Arafat to build his base of terrorists and establishing their cover as "policemen"
Surely, we will see such men as former President Bush questioned on his role in supplying Iraq's Saddam Hussein with money and weapons. Former Sec. of State James Baker will be interrogated about his actions in tasking the CIA to build up the credibility of Saeb Erekat, a man now acting liaison for Arafat and the US. All of the Bush cabinet who were given waivers would be investigated for their special investments in Iraq during the Gulf War. Yes, indeed, besides State Dept. officials, former and sitting Presidents, some in Congress - we may see more than a few indictments as an enraged citizenry demands justice for the American Arabists who assisted the growth of terror for oil money...
...Clearly, in their zeal to assist their friends for the money it brings, American Arabists have become accessories to terrorist murders. If former Presidents, Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State and Defense and State Department officials have been part of the growth of terror, then they must go to prison.
This is totally stupid and racist.
The majority of Arabs in America, for example, are Christians.
The enemy is not Arabs, it is Islam.
The majority of islamic countries are not Arab—Iran, for example. The largest Islamic country in the world is Indonesia—which is Chinese.
Hank
There are 57 Muslim majority countries. According to my Yemeni Arabic teacher, Arabs make up only 20% of the Muslim population worldwide. And you’re right; the five largest Islamic nations (by population) are Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Turkey, and Iran. None of them are Arab. And you’re also right that 70% of Arab-Americans are Christian. I agree that Islam is the problem, not just Arabs.
BUT...that’s not to say that Muslim Arabs are not a threat. There are indeed Arab-sympathizing employees in our govt, like Chas Freeman, and pan-Arabism is a very racist ideology. It claims that Arabs are superior to non-Arab Muslims and that Arabs have the right to massacre and mistreat these minority groups, like what’s going on in Darfur and the Islamic slave trade, for example. Berbers in Morocco are treated as 2nd class citizens even though they are Sunni Muslims. Saddam used chemical weapons on the Muslim Kurds, who are not Arabs. The article does have a point.
“... pan-Arabism is a very racist ideology. It claims that Arabs are superior to non-Arab Muslims and that Arabs have the right to massacre and mistreat these minority groups ...”
Key word is “non-Arab Muslims.” If they were no Muslims there could be no such thing as “pan-Arabism.” There is nothing intrinsic about Arabs that makes them evil, only the terrible political/religious ideology (Islam) most middle-Eastern Arabs have embraced. (Consider, however, even there the Lebanese Christians and Egyptian Coptics).
Not really arguing with you, but against the kind of ignorance that confuses race with ideology. It’s not their race (if Arab is a “race”) that makes embracing them dangerous, but the ideology they hold. If the Saudis were Chinese, would it make any difference?
Hank
I think we’re on the same page. Besides, for the majority of their 4000 year history, Arabs were not Muslims.
BTW, most Lebanese are actually Phoenecian, not Arab, and the Copts are the descendents of the original Egyptians (also non-Arab).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.