Posted on 05/13/2009 12:15:50 PM PDT by smoothsailing
Is Rep. John P. "The P is for Power" Murtha about to become the new Tom DeLay?
He will if Rep. Pete Sessions and the National Republican Congressional Committee have anything to say about it.
DeLay, of course, became the face of Republican congressional corruption in the 2006 cycle.
Though DeLay himself has never been convicted of anything -- and continues to maintain his innocence as federal and state prosecutions against him move forward at a glacial pace -- several of his former aides and lobbying allies pleaded guilty in the Jack Abramoff lobbying corruption scandal.
And Democrats made them pay.
As Naftali Bendavid of the Wall Street Journal wrote in "The Thumpin'," his chronicle of the 2006 campaign, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chairman Rahm Emanuel "ordered his staff to draw up a list of all Republicans who had taken money from DeLay or his former aide Tony Rudy, who had recently pleaded guilty to conspiracy charges. Emanuel also asked for the name of every House Republican who had voted to let DeLay stay on as majority leader even after he was indicted. 'And just go after them,' Emanuel told his staff."
"Go after them" they did, with a vengeance.
Now Sessions -- chairman of the NRCC -- seeks to use Murtha against Democrats the way Emanuel used DeLay against Republicans.
The NRCC just opened this web site to drive a point about Murtha's narcissistic pork barrel spending on a little-used airport that bears his name, and will soon begin tying Democrats across the country to Murtha with radio ads linking their votes in support of the stimulus package to Murtha's airport.
Meanwhile, the guy who ran against Murtha last time and is spoiling for a rematch is adding a new layer of allegations on top of everything already in the Murtha record.
Retired Army Lt. Col. William Russell alleges that Murtha's chief of staff, John Hugya, threatened to have Russell recalled to active military service.
At this point the episode is just a partisan he said/no he said dispute, but it has the potential to grow legs, as we say too often in campaigning, and run away on Murtha.
The episode took place on March 14, at a benefit dinner for the Friends of the National Rifle Association in Washington County, Pennsylvania. According to Russell, he was working the room when he approached a table at which Hugya sat.
"To my face, (Hugya) said, 'What are you going to do when we get the new Secretary of the Army seated and have your (expletive) recalled to active duty,'" says Russell.
The Johnstown Tribune-Democrat first reported on the allegations, and Politico today reports a Murtha spokesman calling the accusations spurious.
Russell's doing his best to establish authenticity for allegation, offering an email from his former commanding officer, Col. Gregory Ritch.
Ritch writes in the email about a January 2009 telephone conversation with Murtha's chief of staff: "John Hugia [sic] began pontificating about many things as he usually does and that is when he stated that there was going to be a recall to Active Duty, on the 'carpetbagger' that ran against Murtha. ... I would swear to this if needed. Just wanted to let you know."
Different conversation, similar tone and, in Russell's view, similar threat.
If it was a threat, it was probably an empty threat, since using the powers of one's congressional office to try to prevent someone from challenging the Member would be a violation of 18 USC 245(B)(1)(a), which prohibits interfering with someone who's trying to engage in federally protected activities -- like campaigning for office.
And a real stickler for the rules could try to make the case that the January phone call itself may have been an improper use of government resources for campaign purposes.
If Hugya was making that phone call from his congressional office, using a telephone that was paid for by the taxpayers, while sitting in a chair paid for by the taxpayers, while sitting under lights that were paid for by the taxpayers, while breathing air that was filtered at the taxpayers' expense ... well, you get the drift.
But it might not matter whether these allegations lead to investigations, either criminal or ethical -- not if this gives Democrats a reason to pull back from Murtha.
They could start to distance themselves from him, by not using him as a major spokesman on issues in his area of expertise.
They could advise candidates not to accept donations from him.
They could stop gathering in "Murtha's corner" on the House floor, where Murtha holds court like a feudal lord.
They could even make clear that Murtha is not to be protected in the next round of redistricting in Pennsylvania, as he was in the last round.
He could stand for re-election in 2010 from a diminished position, and those strategizing on how to win House elections for Murtha's party could see their position diminished, too.
Stay tuned to this one.
DISCLAIMER: When I write about the politicians in my past, CQ Politics says I have to turn the cards face-up. I worked for a candidate who ran against Murtha back in my campaign operative days.
And Chris Bell, the face of Democrat partisanship...
Is Congressman Murtha About To Become the New Tom DeLay?
No. DeLay was innocent.
I’m still waiting for Pete Olson(R) Texas to step up and make some headlines!
I doubt Murtha will be UNJUSTLY run out of Congress on a rail.
SnakeDoc
Murtha is about to become the new Boss Tweed.
If the people of his district had any sense, he would become the ex-congressman.
Apparently, they do and he won’t.
If Ton Delay was the Hammer, then John Murtha is the Plunger...
... and Republican.
Thanks for posting, Smooth.
To be added to the Murtha Watch ping list please notify myself or RedRover.
well, if the Dimocrat long knives are out for Nancy P, it makes sense that her lackey Murtha will be going down with her (no danger that either of those districts would go GOP or anything)
Oh yea - the rule of law always stops the RAT's dead in their tracks.
Delay had trumped-up charges by a political hack that were thrown out.
Murtha has factual(in how own words) legal problems plus issues like laundering taxpayer monies to his family that cannot be pushed under a rug.
You cannot make comparison arguments here at all.
Sorta like saying an bystander civilian accidently shot by US military in Iraq is comparable to the brutal beheading of an American by Al Queida is the same. Yes, the same result(someone dies) but not the same way to treat them.
In 2006, Murtha's opponent recieved 39% of the vote. In 2008, Murtha's opponent recieved over 42% of the vote.
Clearly, there is an increasing number of people in the district who are fed up with the old coot.
ping
This morning POLITICO reported something from our campaign's ‘strange but true' file - take a look at the story when you have a minute. Murtha's team prides itself in a hardball brand of old politics, but this incident crossed every reasonable line, even by their standards.
I will be appearing on the Glenn Beck program on FOXNEWS tomorrow evening, check your local listing for airtimes.
It's been an incredible few months since last November's Round One bout with Mr. Murtha, and our campaign hasn't wasted a minute. When I announced on Election Night that our fight against the Murtha Agenda wasn't over, I meant it.
We've recently re-launched the campaign webquarters, RussellBrigade.com with a new feature to help you follow the incredible trials and tales of Mr. Murtha -- we're calling it "Where's Jack Murtha?"
From the ongoing FBI investigation into the growing Murtha earmark scandal to his incredible statements on Guantanamo and torture, the case against his automatic re-election gets stronger every day.
We're working on some major projects right now that we will be announcing to you first! Please be sure to open our update emails so you don't miss a thing.
Thanks for all you're doing for Freedom's Cause. I value your friendship and support.
With gratitude,
Bill Russell
P.S. Our post-election fundraising has been impressively strong, thanks to friends like you. If you're able, please consider making a monthly contribution of just $25 a month, to keep the lights on at headquarters this summer!
Paid for by William Russell for Congress
| This message sent to ..... by info@RussellBrigarde.com. William Russell for Congress - 23 N Front St - Harrisburg, PA 17101 |
RussellBrigade.com Contributions and Inquiries to:
POBox 630, Johnstown, PA 15907
Tel. 814-525-9171
Contact me to be added to ping list.
Thanks, I had been looking for that “Murtha’s Corner” article
Good news from the ‘Brigade Commander.’
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.