To Push or to Squeeze?

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2009/05/to-push-or-to-squeeze_18.html#readfurther ^ | El Ingles

[ventanax5]

Being of a sinister disposition, I have continued to ruminate upon the likely course of events as relations between European countries and their Muslim fifth columns unravel. In particular, I would like to focus on the probable nature of attempts on the part of native populations to bring about what is euphemistically referred to as the repatriation of their Muslim populations.

To recap briefly, in ‘Surrender, Genocide or What?’ (hereafter referred to as SGW), I suggested that there were three basic ways in which the number of Muslims in any given European country could, in principle, be reduced:

through pressuring them, in whatever fashion, to decide to relocate (Option 1);

through deporting them (Option 2); and,

through large-scale violence which, taken to an extreme, would constitute genocide (Option 3).

I further suggested that certain dynamics long at work in the countries in question had already significantly reduced the likelihood of being able to deal with the problem of Islam through Options 1 and 2 alone. In short, I saw a clear progression of violence and unpleasantness from Option 1 to Option 2 to Option 3, a slippery slope from one to the next, down which European natives were destined to slide, like it or not, as they fought back against Islam and the entire process of Islamization.

[chesley]

WHOA!!

[SunkenCiv]

ruminate upon the likely course of events as relations between European countries and their Muslim fifth columns unravel. In particular, I would like to focus on the probable nature of attempts on the part of native populations to bring about what is euphemistically referred to as the repatriation of their Muslim populations... through pressuring them, in whatever fashion, to decide to relocate (Option 1); through deporting them (Option 2); and, through large-scale violence which, taken to an extreme, would constitute genocide (Option 3)... In short, I saw a clear progression of violence and unpleasantness from Option 1 to Option 2 to Option 3, a slippery slope from one to the next, down which European natives were destined to slide, like it or not, as they fought back against Islam and the entire process of Islamization.

This of course fails to consider Option 4 -- that the Muzzies win and impose shariah law upon Europestan.

[Fred Nerks]

from the comments section:

Islam must be force fed a massive dose of its own putrid medicine.

The simple act of forbidding consanguineous marriage (between first cousins) and a prohibition upon immigration of those who have consumated such unions (along with their concomitant birth defect-ridden offspring), would sharply reduce the burden that Muslims so cheerfully impose upon Western nations.

Strangling the Hawala funds transfer network is another highly productive method of thwarting both jihad and the covert Muslim financial infrastructure in general.

Beyond all irony is how Islam remains so rife with unique vulnerabilities that it alone possesses in such great measure. All that is required is the will to implement reciprocal countermeasures that saddle Muslims with the exact same penalties they so happily impose upon all other faiths.

It is this lack of demand for reciprocity from Islam that, more than anything, epitomizes the yawning gulf which separates modern liberal thought from any demonstration of sanity or reason.

I can only suppose that, along with its hatred of Christianity, modern liberal thought has seen fit to dispose of any regard for the Golden Rule that has always mandated reciprocity

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2009/05/to-push-or-to-squeeze_18.html#readfurther

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks FN!