Posted on 10/16/2009 7:23:26 PM PDT by CyberRBTmail
This is the entire Glenn Beck show from Thursday, October 15th, 2009. In this episode entitled The Radical Truth About Anita Dunn, Beck discusses the White House war on Fox News and Anita Dunns (White House Director of Communications) admiration of Chinas Mao Tse-Tung (who murdered 50 to 70 million dissidents).
Video: Glenn Beck on October 15th, 2009
bookmark - I missed it the other day.
ditto ... FNC live broadcasts shutdown on the web
Do you know why?
This was one of his more powerful episodes...
Do you know why?
The way I heard it today was that they were going to require people to pay to watch fox on the net. I only watch Beck anyway and I can go to his website for his videos. Actually, the local fox news affiliates are still being aired on the net, I watch on freetube.net and it irritated me greatly when, without fanfare, fox news stopped their national feed. I am going to check tomorrow and see if one of the various local fox stations will cover Beck.
This video here is available now on Glennbeck.com(two ns), it is worth watching.
I watch online and all of the online FREE sites indicated today (Friday) that FoxNews didn’t exist.
I won’t pay to watch anything online. I already pay for an ISP and a telephone line.
I saw Glen that day. Someone needs to get this video to him
America is about to cease to exist as we know it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40
I watched him. We need to get this video to him and he needs to drive it down to the bone
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40
I sent it to him.
This is actually good, because while even not using the "Beck Red Phone" (a BRILLIANT ploy by the Good Guys I might add), the White House has stepped into the trap by responding. Now we can punch holes in what they said and search for additional evidence, which will emerge, connecting this high Obama aide to Mao Zedong Thought. This is how we brought down Van Jones. It did not happen with the first swing, we needed the first denial out of the White House to then go on to show them up as liars. Had they not responded at all, that would have made our work more difficult. Now it will be a cake-walk. Here is where I am going:
Unfortunately for them, they are in a corner in one critical area regarding her comments, which they are conveniently ignorning but from which they cannot escape. I devoted another thread to it. And it is this.
Anita Dunn could get away with this, calling it a "joke" or "tongue in cheek" (in her case, the snake tongue makes quite an appearance). This would work if she had only stopped when she said that she considered Mao Zedong as one of her two favorite political philosophers. Here is where she screwed up:
She THEN went on to CONTEXTUALIZE her like or respect of Mao as a philosopher. She referenced him, in a specific historic context. Her point to the students was clearly that "even if your back is up against the wall, no matter what the odds, you can be sure if you stick to it you will suceed, such as the case of Mao Zedong". She then rolled out the specific year 1947 and illustrated his internal political problems within the Communist Party. This speficially represents the year that Mao begin major purges within his Party to gain complete control, these were carried out through murder, assassinations, and further he also strongly ramped up political violence in the areas seized by his Communists from the Nationalists in 1947. THAT IS WHY ANITA DUNN SAID "IN 1947". By it, she SPECIFICALLY contextualized her relationship with Mao, in that she is in awe or somehow considers Mao's political activity against odds even within his own Party, as worthy of attention or note. Again, that engendered some of the bloodiest, revolutionary behavior WITHIN the Communist Party of China.
She cannot laugh this off. The White House cannot laugh it off. They cannot spin it as a joke. And they cannot say it was taken out of context, because she SPECIFICALLY framed and contextualized ("1947") murderous Chairman Mao Zedong with her very own words. See the tape again. It is true. This woman is in big trouble. She cannot get out of this philosophical head lock.
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.