Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
Posted on 11/29/2009 6:22:23 AM PST by Askwhy5times
After the leaked email scandal, the University of East Anglia has been forced to admit they threw away the raw temperature data they used to make their predictions of anthropogenic global warming. They claim they only kept the 'adjusted' data. That is one sure-fire way to prevent skeptics from checking your calculations. Based on what programmers have learned from examining the leaked code the University of East Anglia used to calculate the 'Hockey Stick Graph,' their calculations definitely need rechecking.
(Excerpt) Read more at bluegrasspundit.com ...
It makes all their data completely worthless.
Well then, I guess we will just have to rely on what has been called in other articles the "value-adjusted" processed data for our multi-trillion dollar decision to save the planet. /s
There is now no discernible difference between the tactics of the CRU and the tactics of ACORN.
We’ve GOT to keep this story alive.
Our LIVES depend on it.
Very well said.
1. If they were collecting data from around the world and you assume that they didn't own the collectors, did'nt they destroy other peoples property?
2. Can't the data be reproduced in some fashion for such an important issue?
BTTT!
How great is it that the climatogandists have revealed themselves as frauds rather than engaging in responsible science? And what now for the future of the Nobel Peace Prize which has bee demonstrated, once again, to be sympathetic to popular politics rather than to reality?
Western Civilization depends on it.
I'm happy to report that NASA has reported that Mars' atmospheric warming results from solar not human activity. So Marvin is off the hook.
I propose a special Gore tax at 100% of his wealth derived from his Inconclusive Truths. We then use these funds to launch him to Mars where he can dicuss this issue with Marvin!
How soon before all related stories disappear off of Google?
This is a load of crap. Convert the adjusted data back to its raw form using the inverse of the equations that adjusted it in the first place.
Lets see, the data was disposed of when they moved into a new building? The company I work for pays a RECORDS STORAGE SERVICE to keep all our old stuff in a warehouse.
The dog at their homework?
How about criminal acts!
They can’t back-calculate. The whole pile of crap that is AGW has turned out to be un-reproducible, forwards or backwards. Nobody can explain what equations were used in the first place.
The media is buying the bs that this is ‘real complicated’....it shouldn’t be that complex at all. They have made it complex to fit their goals; and, the whole un-reproducible charade is the antithesis of the scientific method.
Yet Copenhagen goes on. I want more than on senator to make noise about this.
“It makes all their data completely worthless. “
You’ve got that right.
In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual. - Galileo Galilei, 1564-1642
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.