Skip to comments.
Climategate Cover-up: CRU Climate Change Scientists THREW OUT RAW NUMBERS !!
UK Telegraph/The Lid/London Times ^
| 11/29/09
| The Lid
Posted on 11/29/2009 8:34:49 AM PST by Shellybenoit
Snatching a page from ACORN, scientists at the CRU have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based. That means the basic calculations used to create the man-made global warming hysteria cannot be checked by neutral observers....
(Excerpt) Read more at yidwithlid.blogspot.com ...
TOPICS: Conspiracy; Politics; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: climatechange; climategate; coverup; cri; hadleycru
To: Shellybenoit
They threw away the alleged data.
To: Shellybenoit
Creating stats/avgs....Throw out the highest and lowest and create the mean. BUT the problem becomes whether the high and low is true or erroneous or conjecture.
In other words, pay me enough and I can come up with whatever you want.
The next problem: "Predicting the future"!!!!!!!
To: Shellybenoit
Nothing to see here. Move on. Nothing to see here.
To: Sacajaweau
....they threw away the ENTIRE paper originals.....Historic Documents all....
5
posted on
11/29/2009 8:58:41 AM PST
by
spokeshave
(Albore can uninvent the internet about as well as 0bama can unjump the shark)
To: poindexter
Scientists never ever never throw out the raw data. In any pursuit in science the raw data is preserved for other theories and for other scientists to validate the conclusions of the theories being tested. If you throw out the raw data you are in effect saying my theories are useless and of no value as they can not be validated and checked by other scientists. This is basic to research. This is what we are taught.
This group of "so called researchers" has already been caught in their emails conspiring to distort the real data in their possession. However, at this time they are expecting us to believe the data that they have worked on and changed. There is only one reason to throw this out.
THEY ARE LYING!
6
posted on
11/29/2009 9:04:51 AM PST
by
cpdiii
(roughneck, oilfield trash and proud of it, geologist, pilot, pharmacist, iconoclast.)
To: Shellybenoit; All
Question for all:
What if we were discussing this at a Thanksgiving dinner, and I were to get a certain look on my face and make this statement: "It's another sign of the moral decay of society", and to say it like that's the last thing to be said on the subject?
Just askin'.
7
posted on
11/29/2009 9:07:02 AM PST
by
OKSooner
("He's quite mad, you know." - Sean Connery to Honor Blackman in "Goldfinger".)
To: spokeshave
Phil Jones smugly and triumphantly acknowledged this some weeks ago, at least, in response to a FOIA request from a Colorado researcher. At the time he clearly expected never to be held accountable. The arrogance of power at work.
To: cpdiii
For example if a drug company went to the FDA for a new drug application and did not have the raw data to back up their claims about the new drug, the FDA would immediately start and investigation of what the hell is wrong with that company and criminal charges would follow quickly.
9
posted on
11/29/2009 9:07:33 AM PST
by
cpdiii
(roughneck, oilfield trash and proud of it, geologist, pilot, pharmacist, iconoclast.)
To: Shellybenoit
10
posted on
11/29/2009 9:36:00 AM PST
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
To: cpdiii
Scientists never ever never throw out the raw data. Image if a drug company did this.
To: Shellybenoit; Thunder90; Entrepreneur; Defendingliberty; Nervous Tick; 4horses+amule; WL-law; ...
12
posted on
11/30/2009 1:09:08 AM PST
by
steelyourfaith
(Time to prosecute Al Gore now that fellow scam artist Bernie Madoff is in stir.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson