[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

We can only assume two things:

(1) The current First Lady intended to perform her duties at the ceremony nude, so wearing clothes was a news-worthy change.

(2) The bar has been set so low in terms of competence, decorum, and expectations that managing to wear clothes when going out in public is considered an accomplishment for her.

In either event, this makes us realize something that’s escaped us to this point: while the “outfits” Mrs. Utopia parades around in, from giant Playschool wrestling belts to furniture upholstery dresses, range from ridiculous to vulgar, at LEAST she’s wearing clothes. Things could, thus, be much, much worse in terms of what she wears out in public.

On this Saturday, please join us in thanks for small blessings.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Ping! :)

[Northern Yankee]

The fact that she wore clothes, and was able to identify where the Christmas tree is located is a pretty good day at the office for her. ; )

[varon]

................while the “outfits” Mrs. Utopia parades around in, from giant Playschool wrestling belts to furniture upholstery dresses, range from ridiculous to vulgar,....................

[Bad Jack Bauer]

Even if she had shown up at the event nude, she still would have worn the belt.

[1776 Reborn]

The woman is a walking billboard for bathroom wallpaper!

[hyperconservative]

Thanks for sharing such a humorous write-up.

It was quite funny!

[libertarian27]

The article on the Hillbuzz link is a riot!

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Ping! ;)

[Pollster1]

It’s better than anything her husband has accomplished.

[Bernard]

The same FLOTUS who revels in mixing orange and blue and purple and yellow in color wheel collisions apparently has a problem with red and green, worn completely appropriately, at a Christmas tree lighting ceremony.

Is there a color scheme for Kwanzaa?

[maggief]

Complete with a holiday boob belt.

[Liz]

"How dumb can you get? I told you.....no bowing to the Japanese emperor."
"Now I gotta drag out your wife and kids in those ugly Crew clothes to fix this
screwup, so you look good, again."

[jaydee770]

The First Lady *REALLY* needs a friend that can tell her when she looks like a “4-year old that dressed herself in the dark”.

But, I guess it’s a cultural thing and it speaks to her upbringing. What’s the saying, “you can take the person out of the ghetto; but you can’t take the ghetto out of the person.”

She’s too old to change.

[Mr. Silverback]

Yetr another thing to remember as a media jackal in the 21st Century: Your placeholder text may end up in front of the entire planet.

[bitt]

GEEZ, I might have to start going to this other website MORE!

ANOTHER GREAT POST ON HILLBUZZ.COM:

Question of the Day: Why would you keep your college transcripts from being released?
Posted by hillbuzz under Uncategorized | Tags: Why all the secrecy from most transparent administration ever?, Why not release birth certificate?, Why not release college transcripts? |
[85] Comments

Here’s an interesting question someone posed to us in an email. ”Why would you keep your college transcripts from being released, if everyone who held your current job was forced to release them in the past?”.

This is, of course, in no way whatsoever connected to the current occupant of the White House.

But, we thought about this question and came up with only two reasons why we would refuse to release our college records to the public if we held positions where every man who held the job before us had relased theirs:

(1) Our grades were terrible and we’d ruin the fantasy we created that we are incredibly intelligent; as minorities, we’d also be worried the terrible grades would make people think the only way we got into the expensive Ivy League schools we attended was because of Affirmative Action

or

(2) The transcripts would include financial aid information, specifically showing how our education was financed and who paid for it; either we received scholarships such as a Fulbright grant for foreign students that we shouldn’t have as US citizens or someone unseemly funded our studies.

Those are the only two reasons we can think of for why we would refuse and refuse and refuse all attempts to release these matters of record to the public, when, as noted, everyone who held the position before us did just that — without making a big issue of being compelled to do so.

What would keep you from releasing your own records in a similar situation?

[RichInOC]

Praise the Lord, child of God!

The mere thought of that woman nekked makes my eyes hurt.

[a fool in paradise]

The Emperor’s New Clothes sure are fancy this season.